AABVF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.28M
BMNM
Price
$1.01
Change
-$0.03 (-2.88%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
9.18M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AABVF vs BMNM

Header iconAABVF vs BMNM Comparison
Open Charts AABVF vs BMNMBanner chart's image
Aberdeen International
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$29.4K
Capitalization3.28M
Bimini Capital Management
Price$1.01
Change-$0.03 (-2.88%)
Volume$1.03K
Capitalization9.18M
AABVF vs BMNM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AABVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BMNM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AABVF vs. BMNM commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AABVF is a Hold and BMNM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (AABVF: $0.02 vs. BMNM: $1.01)
Brand notoriety: AABVF and BMNM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AABVF: 256% vs. BMNM: 10%
Market capitalization -- AABVF: $3.28M vs. BMNM: $9.18M
AABVF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $3.28M. BMNM’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $9.18M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AABVF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBMNM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AABVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • BMNM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BMNM is a better buy in the long-term than AABVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AABVF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BMNM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AABVF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • BMNM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BMNM is a better buy in the short-term than AABVF.

Price Growth

AABVF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -15.83% price change this week, while BMNM (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

BMNM is expected to report earnings on May 02, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.66% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BMNM($9.18M) has a higher market cap than AABVF($3.28M). BMNM has higher P/E ratio than AABVF: BMNM (84.75) vs AABVF (4.52). BMNM YTD gains are higher at: 1.000 vs. AABVF (-12.104). AABVF has less debt than BMNM: AABVF (40K) vs BMNM (27.4M). BMNM has higher revenues than AABVF: BMNM (8.22M) vs AABVF (-12.89M).
AABVFBMNMAABVF / BMNM
Capitalization3.28M9.18M36%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-12.1041.000-1,210%
P/E Ratio4.5284.755%
Revenue-12.89M8.22M-157%
Total Cash273KN/A-
Total Debt40K27.4M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AABVF vs BMNM: Fundamental Ratings
AABVF
BMNM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8930
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10078
SMR RATING
1..100
9993
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8845
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
891
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AABVF's Valuation (78) in the null industry is in the same range as BMNM (81). This means that AABVF’s stock grew similarly to BMNM’s over the last 12 months.

BMNM's Profit vs Risk Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as AABVF (100). This means that BMNM’s stock grew similarly to AABVF’s over the last 12 months.

BMNM's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as AABVF (99). This means that BMNM’s stock grew similarly to AABVF’s over the last 12 months.

BMNM's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AABVF (88). This means that BMNM’s stock grew somewhat faster than AABVF’s over the last 12 months.

BMNM's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AABVF (89). This means that BMNM’s stock grew significantly faster than AABVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AABVFBMNM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AABVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BMNM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NKE76.270.85
+1.13%
Nike
TURN4.200.03
+0.70%
180 Degree Capital Corp
ETWO3.290.01
+0.30%
E2open Parent Holdings
NEU706.07-12.87
-1.79%
NewMarket Corp
BNTC11.18-0.73
-6.13%
Benitec Biopharma

AABVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AABVF and ASXSF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AABVF and ASXSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AABVF
1D Price
Change %
AABVF100%
-8.25%
ASXSF - AABVF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BMNM - AABVF
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.88%
AMDUF - AABVF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AJMPF - AABVF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SII - AABVF
0%
Poorly correlated
-1.27%
More

BMNM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BMNM and AZIHF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BMNM and AZIHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMNM
1D Price
Change %
BMNM100%
-2.88%
AZIHF - BMNM
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AHFCF - BMNM
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AABVF - BMNM
6%
Poorly correlated
-8.25%
BRSGF - BMNM
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMDUF - BMNM
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More