AABVF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Updated
Dec 19 closing price
SII
Price
$42.35
Change
+$0.68 (+1.63%)
Updated
Dec 19 closing price
63 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AABVF vs SII

Header iconAABVF vs SII Comparison
Open Charts AABVF vs SIIBanner chart's image
Aberdeen International
Price$0.03
Change-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Volume$347
CapitalizationN/A
Sprott
Price$42.35
Change+$0.68 (+1.63%)
Volume$92.15K
CapitalizationN/A
AABVF vs SII Comparison Chart
Loading...
AABVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SII
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AABVF vs. SII commentary
Dec 20, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AABVF is a Hold and SII is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 20, 2024
Stock price -- (AABVF: $0.03 vs. SII: $42.35)
Brand notoriety: AABVF and SII are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AABVF: 3% vs. SII: 88%
Market capitalization -- AABVF: $3.28M vs. SII: $964.89M
AABVF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $3.28M. SII’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $964.89M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AABVF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSII’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AABVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SII’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SII is a better buy in the long-term than AABVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AABVF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SII’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AABVF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • SII’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SII is a better buy in the short-term than AABVF.

Price Growth

AABVF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +7.24% price change this week, while SII (@Investment Managers) price change was -5.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

SII is expected to report earnings on Feb 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.80% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SII($965M) has a higher market cap than AABVF($3.28M). SII has higher P/E ratio than AABVF: SII (23.24) vs AABVF (4.52). AABVF YTD gains are higher at: 103.268 vs. SII (27.965). SII has more cash in the bank: 22.9M vs. AABVF (273K). AABVF has less debt than SII: AABVF (40K) vs SII (24.2M). SII has higher revenues than AABVF: SII (141M) vs AABVF (-12.89M).
AABVFSIIAABVF / SII
Capitalization3.28M965M0%
EBITDAN/A57.2M-
Gain YTD103.26827.965369%
P/E Ratio4.5223.2419%
Revenue-12.89M141M-9%
Total Cash273K22.9M1%
Total Debt40K24.2M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AABVF vs SII: Fundamental Ratings
AABVF
SII
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9478
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10034
SMR RATING
1..100
9856
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3652
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9057
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9532

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SII's Valuation (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AABVF (67). This means that SII’s stock grew somewhat faster than AABVF’s over the last 12 months.

SII's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AABVF (100). This means that SII’s stock grew significantly faster than AABVF’s over the last 12 months.

SII's SMR Rating (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AABVF (98). This means that SII’s stock grew somewhat faster than AABVF’s over the last 12 months.

AABVF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as SII (52). This means that AABVF’s stock grew similarly to SII’s over the last 12 months.

SII's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AABVF (90). This means that SII’s stock grew somewhat faster than AABVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AABVFSII
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AABVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SII
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FGLGX22.790.06
+0.26%
Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock
EATVX40.19N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Tx-Mgd Value A
SEKRX18.49-0.03
-0.16%
DWS Emerging Markets Equity R6
CMDYX13.92-0.03
-0.22%
Columbia Mid Cap Index Inst3
RMYCX9.10-0.03
-0.33%
Russell Inv Multi-Strategy Income C

AABVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AABVF and ASXSF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AABVF and ASXSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AABVF
1D Price
Change %
AABVF100%
-18.16%
ASXSF - AABVF
11%
Poorly correlated
-5.95%
BMNM - AABVF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMDUF - AABVF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AJMPF - AABVF
1%
Poorly correlated
-26.32%
SII - AABVF
0%
Poorly correlated
+1.63%
More

SII and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SII has been loosely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SII jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SII
1D Price
Change %
SII100%
+1.63%
BN - SII
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
BAM - SII
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.78%
BX - SII
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.62%
BK - SII
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.78%
NXDT - SII
37%
Loosely correlated
+7.11%
More