AACAF
Price
$4.53
Change
-$0.22 (-4.63%)
Updated
Jun 2 closing price
Capitalization
2.73B
UI
Price
$408.54
Change
+$6.13 (+1.52%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
7B
76 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AACAF vs UI

Header iconAACAF vs UI Comparison
Open Charts AACAF vs UIBanner chart's image
AAC Technologies Holdings
Price$4.53
Change-$0.22 (-4.63%)
Volume$1.08K
Capitalization2.73B
Ubiquiti
Price$408.54
Change+$6.13 (+1.52%)
Volume$54.82K
Capitalization7B
AACAF vs UI Comparison Chart
Loading...
UI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AACAF vs. UI commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AACAF is a Hold and UI is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (AACAF: $4.53 vs. UI: $408.54)
Brand notoriety: AACAF and UI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Telecommunications Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AACAF: 491% vs. UI: 55%
Market capitalization -- AACAF: $2.73B vs. UI: $7B
AACAF [@Telecommunications Equipment] is valued at $2.73B. UI’s [@Telecommunications Equipment] market capitalization is $7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry ranges from $202.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry is $5.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AACAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AACAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, UI is a better buy in the long-term than AACAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

UI’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • UI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

AACAF (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а -4.79% price change this week, while UI (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was +3.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was +2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

UI is expected to report earnings on Aug 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Telecommunications Equipment (+2.30% weekly)

The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UI($7B) has a higher market cap than AACAF($2.73B). AACAF has higher P/E ratio than UI: AACAF (25.38) vs UI (18.72). UI YTD gains are higher at: 23.467 vs. AACAF (-7.811). AACAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.2B vs. UI (545M). AACAF has more cash in the bank: 5.22B vs. UI (97.7M). UI has less debt than AACAF: UI (1.05B) vs AACAF (10.2B). AACAF has higher revenues than UI: AACAF (18.5B) vs UI (1.88B).
AACAFUIAACAF / UI
Capitalization2.73B7B39%
EBITDA1.2B545M220%
Gain YTD-7.81123.467-33%
P/E Ratio25.3818.72136%
Revenue18.5B1.88B986%
Total Cash5.22B97.7M5,341%
Total Debt10.2B1.05B972%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AACAF vs UI: Fundamental Ratings
AACAF
UI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8979
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9946
SMR RATING
1..100
8511
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6037
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9112
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AACAF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for UI (96). This means that AACAF’s stock grew significantly faster than UI’s over the last 12 months.

UI's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AACAF (99). This means that UI’s stock grew somewhat faster than AACAF’s over the last 12 months.

UI's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AACAF (85). This means that UI’s stock grew significantly faster than AACAF’s over the last 12 months.

UI's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as AACAF (60). This means that UI’s stock grew similarly to AACAF’s over the last 12 months.

UI's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AACAF (91). This means that UI’s stock grew significantly faster than AACAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
UI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
UI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NBSLX49.81N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity I
GSTRX9.61N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth R
TSMVX26.99N/A
N/A
Transamerica Small/Mid Cap Value I2
LGLOX51.49N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders F3
AFALX11.21N/A
N/A
Applied Finance Dividend Investor

AACAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AACAF and AACAY have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AACAF and AACAY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AACAF
1D Price
Change %
AACAF100%
N/A
AACAY - AACAF
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.90%
BEWFF - AACAF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMBM - AACAF
10%
Poorly correlated
+11.26%
UI - AACAF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.52%
BYLTF - AACAF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More