AACI
Price
$10.33
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
326.42M
FORL
Price
$11.93
Change
+$0.44 (+3.83%)
Updated
Sep 24, 01:30 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
27.23M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AACI vs FORL

Header iconAACI vs FORL Comparison
Open Charts AACI vs FORLBanner chart's image
Armada Acquisition Corp II
Price$10.33
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$67.52K
Capitalization326.42M
Four Leaf Acquisition
Price$11.93
Change+$0.44 (+3.83%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization27.23M
AACI vs FORL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AACI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FORL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AACI vs. FORL commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AACI is a Buy and FORL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (AACI: $10.33 vs. FORL: $11.49)
Brand notoriety: AACI and FORL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AACI: 47% vs. FORL: 411%
Market capitalization -- AACI: $326.42M vs. FORL: $27.23M
AACI [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $326.42M. FORL’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $27.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $173.25M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AACI’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFORL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AACI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FORL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FORL is a better buy in the long-term than AACI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AACI’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FORL’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AACI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FORL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FORL is a better buy in the short-term than AACI.

Price Growth

AACI (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.32% price change this week, while FORL (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -2.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.60% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AACI($326M) has a higher market cap than FORL($27.2M). AACI YTD gains are higher at: 5.979 vs. FORL (3.514). AACI has more cash in the bank: 480K vs. FORL (9.8K).
AACIFORLAACI / FORL
Capitalization326M27.2M1,199%
EBITDAN/A-1.15M-
Gain YTD5.9793.514170%
P/E RatioN/A234.60-
RevenueN/A0-
Total Cash480K9.8K4,896%
Total DebtN/A3.12M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AACIFORL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
14%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
10%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
23%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
23%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
32%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
N/A
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
N/A
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
31%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
16%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
14%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AACI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FORL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INGN8.460.03
+0.36%
Inogen
NYC9.95N/A
N/A
American Strategic Investment Co
TEL214.47-1.09
-0.51%
TE CONNECTIVITY Ltd
BCO115.73-0.61
-0.52%
Brink's Company (The)
YDES14.24-2.86
-16.74%
YD Bio Limited

AACI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AACI and GRAF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AACI and GRAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AACI
1D Price
Change %
AACI100%
+0.03%
GRAF - AACI
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
TRTLF - AACI
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AACIU - AACI
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HAIUF - AACI
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASUUF - AACI
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FORL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FORL and IROH have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FORL and IROH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FORL
1D Price
Change %
FORL100%
N/A
IROH - FORL
33%
Poorly correlated
+3.22%
BKHA - FORL
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
PLTYF - FORL
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AACI - FORL
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
EURK - FORL
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
More