AACI
Price
$10.25
Change
-$0.03 (-0.29%)
Updated
Sep 5, 10:32 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
323.8M
FORL
Price
$11.97
Change
+$0.24 (+2.05%)
Updated
Sep 4, 11:35 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
47.84M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AACI vs FORL

Header iconAACI vs FORL Comparison
Open Charts AACI vs FORLBanner chart's image
Armada Acquisition Corp II
Price$10.25
Change-$0.03 (-0.29%)
Volume$900
Capitalization323.8M
Four Leaf Acquisition
Price$11.97
Change+$0.24 (+2.05%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization47.84M
AACI vs FORL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AACI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FORL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AACI vs. FORL commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AACI is a Hold and FORL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (AACI: $10.25 vs. FORL: $11.73)
Brand notoriety: AACI and FORL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AACI: 1% vs. FORL: 9%
Market capitalization -- AACI: $323.8M vs. FORL: $47.84M
AACI [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $323.8M. FORL’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $47.84M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $172.82M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AACI’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFORL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AACI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FORL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FORL is a better buy in the long-term than AACI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AACI’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FORL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AACI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FORL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FORL is a better buy in the short-term than AACI.

Price Growth

AACI (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -0.39% price change this week, while FORL (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.78%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.02% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AACI($324M) has a higher market cap than FORL($47.8M). FORL YTD gains are higher at: 5.676 vs. AACI (5.128). AACI has more cash in the bank: 480K vs. FORL (1.26K).
AACIFORLAACI / FORL
Capitalization324M47.8M678%
EBITDAN/A-1.23M-
Gain YTD5.1285.67690%
P/E RatioN/A234.60-
RevenueN/A0-
Total Cash480K1.26K37,975%
Total DebtN/A2.55M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AACIFORL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
7%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
20%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
23%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
10%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
6%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
8%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
10%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
15%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
39%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
22%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
14%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AACI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FORL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RLGT6.470.17
+2.70%
Radiant Logistics
ADT8.820.15
+1.73%
ADT
HIMX8.320.11
+1.34%
Himax Technologies
XNGSF8.46N/A
N/A
ENN Energy Holdings Ltd.
LTRN4.20-0.09
-2.10%
Lantern Pharma

AACI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AACI has been loosely correlated with GRAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AACI jumps, then GRAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AACI
1D Price
Change %
AACI100%
N/A
GRAF - AACI
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TRTLF - AACI
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AACIU - AACI
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HAIUF - AACI
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASUUF - AACI
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FORL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FORL has been loosely correlated with BKHA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FORL jumps, then BKHA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FORL
1D Price
Change %
FORL100%
N/A
BKHA - FORL
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.91%
IROH - FORL
33%
Poorly correlated
-15.71%
ATMC - FORL
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLTYF - FORL
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AACI - FORL
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More