AAFRF
Price
$2.70
Change
+$0.41 (+17.90%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
5.62B
CHRUF
Price
$5.35
Change
+$1.20 (+28.92%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.34B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AAFRF vs CHRUF

Header iconAAFRF vs CHRUF Comparison
Open Charts AAFRF vs CHRUFBanner chart's image
Airtel Africa
Price$2.70
Change+$0.41 (+17.90%)
Volume$1.13K
Capitalization5.62B
CHORUS
Price$5.35
Change+$1.20 (+28.92%)
Volume$302
Capitalization2.34B
AAFRF vs CHRUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AAFRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AAFRF vs. CHRUF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAFRF is a Hold and CHRUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (AAFRF: $2.70 vs. CHRUF: $5.35)
Brand notoriety: AAFRF and CHRUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wireless Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AAFRF: 22% vs. CHRUF: 100%
Market capitalization -- AAFRF: $5.62B vs. CHRUF: $2.34B
AAFRF [@Wireless Telecommunications] is valued at $5.62B. CHRUF’s [@Wireless Telecommunications] market capitalization is $2.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry ranges from $12.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry is $17.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AAFRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCHRUF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AAFRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CHRUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CHRUF is a better buy in the long-term than AAFRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AAFRF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • AAFRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

AAFRF (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а +3.09% price change this week, while CHRUF (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wireless Telecommunications (+1.68% weekly)

Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AAFRF($5.62B) has a higher market cap than CHRUF($2.34B). CHRUF has higher P/E ratio than AAFRF: CHRUF (121.95) vs AAFRF (16.47). AAFRF YTD gains are higher at: 119.575 vs. CHRUF (0.000). AAFRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.78B vs. CHRUF (610M). AAFRF has more cash in the bank: 968M vs. CHRUF (88M). CHRUF has less debt than AAFRF: CHRUF (2.51B) vs AAFRF (4.15B). AAFRF has higher revenues than CHRUF: AAFRF (5.38B) vs CHRUF (978M).
AAFRFCHRUFAAFRF / CHRUF
Capitalization5.62B2.34B240%
EBITDA1.78B610M292%
Gain YTD119.5750.000-
P/E Ratio16.47121.9514%
Revenue5.38B978M550%
Total Cash968M88M1,100%
Total Debt4.15B2.51B165%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AAFRFCHRUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
13%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
12%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AAFRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VVPSX12.400.01
+0.08%
Vulcan Value Partners Small Cap
USDEUR0.85N/A
N/A
United States Dollar - Euro
EURCNY8.43N/A
N/A
Euro - China Yuan
HKDJPY18.44N/A
N/A
Hong Kong Dollar - Japan Yen
CHFAUD1.91-0.00
-0.21%
Switzerland Franc - Australian Dollar

AAFRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AAFRF and HKBNF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AAFRF and HKBNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AAFRF
1D Price
Change %
AAFRF100%
+17.95%
HKBNF - AAFRF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KORE - AAFRF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHRUF - AAFRF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NETLF - AAFRF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MACT - AAFRF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
More

CHRUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHRUF has been closely correlated with GTMEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHRUF jumps, then GTMEF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHRUF
1D Price
Change %
CHRUF100%
N/A
GTMEF - CHRUF
69%
Closely correlated
N/A
AAFRF - CHRUF
1%
Poorly correlated
+17.95%
HKBNF - CHRUF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NETLF - CHRUF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KORE - CHRUF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More