AAFRF
Price
$3.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
10.81B
MACT
Price
$7.60
Change
+$0.10 (+1.33%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
24.86M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AAFRF vs MACT

Header iconAAFRF vs MACT Comparison
Open Charts AAFRF vs MACTBanner chart's image
Airtel Africa
Price$3.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.24K
Capitalization10.81B
MachTen
Price$7.60
Change+$0.10 (+1.33%)
Volume$500
Capitalization24.86M
AAFRF vs MACT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AAFRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MACT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AAFRF vs. MACT commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAFRF is a Buy and MACT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (AAFRF: $3.02 vs. MACT: $7.60)
Brand notoriety: AAFRF and MACT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AAFRF: 132% vs. MACT: 21%
Market capitalization -- AAFRF: $10.81B vs. MACT: $24.86M
AAFRF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $10.81B. MACT’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $24.86M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $284.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AAFRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMACT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AAFRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MACT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AAFRF is a better buy in the long-term than MACT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AAFRF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MACT’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AAFRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MACT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AAFRF is a better buy in the short-term than MACT.

Price Growth

AAFRF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а -0.46% price change this week, while MACT (@Major Telecommunications) price change was +1.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (-0.28% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AAFRF($10.8B) has a higher market cap than MACT($24.9M). AAFRF YTD gains are higher at: 145.183 vs. MACT (7.801).
AAFRFMACTAAFRF / MACT
Capitalization10.8B24.9M43,373%
EBITDA2.44BN/A-
Gain YTD145.1837.8011,861%
P/E Ratio32.78N/A-
Revenue5.21BN/A-
Total Cash784MN/A-
Total Debt6.2BN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AAFRFMACT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
44%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AAFRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MACT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EBGEF25.000.34
+1.38%
Enbridge Inc.
PNPNF1.000.01
+1.01%
Power Metallic Mines Inc.
HAWPF10.62N/A
N/A
Haw Par Corp. Ltd.
TIAIY5.39N/A
N/A
Telecom Italia S.p.A.
MCHT7.30N/A
N/A
Mauch Chunk Trust Financial Corp.

AAFRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AAFRF and HKBNF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AAFRF and HKBNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AAFRF
1D Price
Change %
AAFRF100%
N/A
HKBNF - AAFRF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KORE - AAFRF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.81%
CHRUF - AAFRF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NETLF - AAFRF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MACT - AAFRF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MACT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MACT and TCPFF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MACT and TCPFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MACT
1D Price
Change %
MACT100%
N/A
TCPFF - MACT
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NETLF - MACT
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KORE - MACT
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.81%
AAFRF - MACT
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHRUF - MACT
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More