Ad is loading...
AAFTX vs RHFTX
AAFTX vs RHFTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AAFTX vs. RHFTX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAFTX is a Hold and RHFTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AAFTX (48B) and RHFTX (48B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RHFTX pays higher dividends than AAFTX: RHFTX (1.86) vs AAFTX (1.68). AAFTX was incepted earlier than RHFTX: AAFTX (18 years) vs RHFTX (9 years). AAFTX (0.67) is less costly to investors than RHFTX (0.48). AAFTX (250) and RHFTX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RHFTX (6.57) and AAFTX (6.36) have marching annual gain over last year. RHFTX (36.96) and AAFTX (36.05) have equivalent 5 years return.
| AAFTX | RHFTX | AAFTX / RHFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.48 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.48 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.370 | 0.424 | 87% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48B | 48B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.68 | 1.86 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.36 | 6.57 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.82 | 16.31 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.05 | 36.96 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.63 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...