Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AAGTX vs FAFFX
AAGTX vs FAFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AAGTX vs. FAFFX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAGTX is a Hold and FAFFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AAGTX has more cash in the bank: 50B vs. FAFFX (2.89B). AAGTX (1.13) and FAFFX (1.13) have matching dividends . AAGTX was incepted earlier than FAFFX: AAGTX (19 years) vs FAFFX (22 years). FAFFX (0.92) is less costly to investors than AAGTX (0.68). FAFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. AAGTX (6.00). AAGTX (6%) and FAFFX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FAFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AAGTX: FAFFX (0) vs AAGTX (250). AAGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.30 vs. FAFFX (10.09). AAGTX return over 5 years is better than : 42.56 vs. FAFFX (30.80).
| AAGTX | FAFFX | AAGTX / FAFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.92 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.92 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.475 | 11.520 | 134% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50B | 2.89B | 1,731% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 1.13 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.30 | 10.09 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.67 | 50.22 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.56 | 30.80 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.69 | 46.62 | 201% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement