Ad is loading...
AAGTX vs FCGTX
AAGTX vs FCGTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AAGTX vs. FCGTX commentary
Apr 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAGTX is a Hold and FCGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AAGTX (43.4B) and FCGTX (43.4B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FCGTX pays higher dividends than AAGTX: FCGTX (1.60) vs AAGTX (1.29). AAGTX was incepted earlier than FCGTX: AAGTX (18 years) vs FCGTX (8 years). AAGTX (0.68) is less costly to investors than FCGTX (0.36). AAGTX (6.00) and FCGTX (6.00) have comparable annual turnover. AAGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGTX: AAGTX (250) vs FCGTX (1000000). FCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.33 vs. AAGTX (6.96). FCGTX (46.99) and AAGTX (45.31) have equivalent 5 years return.
| AAGTX | FCGTX | AAGTX / FCGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.36 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.36 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.881 | -0.782 | 113% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.4B | 43.4B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 1.60 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.96 | 7.33 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.83 | 17.60 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.31 | 46.99 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.62 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...