Ad is loading...
AAHYX vs PZRMX
AAHYX vs PZRMX Comparison
Open Charts AAHYX vs PZRMX
Thrivent Conservative Allocation A
Price$6.91
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets942.72M
PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asst A
Price$8.31
Change+$0.04 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.82B
AAHYX vs PZRMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AAHYX vs. PZRMX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAHYX is a Hold and PZRMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PZRMX has more cash in the bank: 1.82B vs. AAHYX (943M). AAHYX pays higher dividends than PZRMX: AAHYX (3.88) vs PZRMX (3.25). AAHYX was incepted earlier than PZRMX: AAHYX (28 years) vs PZRMX (14 years). PZRMX (2.62) is less costly to investors than AAHYX (0.95). PZRMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 219.00 vs. AAHYX (80.00). PZRMX initial investment is less costly to investors than AAHYX (5%) vs AAHYX (5%). PZRMX has a lower initial minimum investment than AAHYX: PZRMX (1000) vs AAHYX (2000). PZRMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.29 vs. AAHYX (5.94). PZRMX return over 5 years is better than : 45.47 vs. AAHYX (19.10).
| AAHYX | PZRMX | AAHYX / PZRMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 2.40 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 2.62 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.354 | 4.266 | -32% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 82% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 943M | 1.82B | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.88 | 3.25 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.94 | 8.29 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.96 | 4.70 | 170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.10 | 45.47 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.62 | 51.50 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers