Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AAMTX vs CCJTX
AAMTX vs CCJTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AAMTX vs. CCJTX commentary
Oct 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAMTX is a Hold and CCJTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AAMTX (28.4B) and CCJTX (28.4B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . AAMTX pays higher dividends than CCJTX: AAMTX (0.81) vs CCJTX (0.19). AAMTX was incepted earlier than CCJTX: AAMTX (16 years) vs CCJTX (12 years). CCJTX (1.46) is less costly to investors than AAMTX (0.73). AAMTX (5.00) and CCJTX (5.00) have comparable annual turnover. AAMTX (250) and CCJTX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. AAMTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.41 vs. CCJTX (11.49). AAMTX return over 5 years is better than : 46.16 vs. CCJTX (41.95).
| AAMTX | CCJTX | AAMTX / CCJTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.46 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.46 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.054 | 15.409 | 104% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.4B | 28.4B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 0.19 | 424% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.41 | 11.49 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.24 | 56.27 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.16 | 41.95 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.00 | 97.87 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement