Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AAOTX vs FAXDX
AAOTX vs FAXDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AAOTX vs. FAXDX commentary
May 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAOTX is a Hold and FAXDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AAOTX has more cash in the bank: 4.43B vs. FAXDX (335M). FAXDX pays higher dividends than AAOTX: FAXDX (0.91) vs AAOTX (0.84). AAOTX was incepted earlier than FAXDX: AAOTX (5 years) vs FAXDX (6 years). FAXDX (1.50) is less costly to investors than AAOTX (0.74). FAXDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. AAOTX (4.00). FAXDX has a lower initial minimum investment than AAOTX: FAXDX (0) vs AAOTX (250). AAOTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.55 vs. FAXDX (7.06). AAOTX return over 5 years is better than : 61.68 vs. FAXDX (51.72).
| AAOTX | FAXDX | AAOTX / FAXDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.50 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.50 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.337 | 3.715 | 90% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.43B | 335M | 1,321% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 0.91 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.55 | 7.06 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.63 | 31.56 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.68 | 51.72 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement