Ad is loading...
AAOTX vs FAXDX
AAOTX vs FAXDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AAOTX vs. FAXDX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAOTX is a Hold and FAXDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AAOTX has more cash in the bank: 4.23B vs. FAXDX (322M). FAXDX pays higher dividends than AAOTX: FAXDX (0.91) vs AAOTX (0.84). AAOTX was incepted earlier than FAXDX: AAOTX (5 years) vs FAXDX (6 years). FAXDX (1.50) is less costly to investors than AAOTX (0.74). FAXDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. AAOTX (4.00). FAXDX has a lower initial minimum investment than AAOTX: FAXDX (0) vs AAOTX (250). AAOTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.33 vs. FAXDX (5.49). AAOTX return over 5 years is better than : 57.65 vs. FAXDX (47.26).
| AAOTX | FAXDX | AAOTX / FAXDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.50 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.50 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.266 | -0.310 | 409% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.23B | 322M | 1,315% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 0.91 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.33 | 5.49 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.27 | 19.21 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.65 | 47.26 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...