Ad is loading...
AAOTX vs FFBSX
AAOTX vs FFBSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AAOTX vs. FFBSX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAOTX is a Hold and FFBSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AAOTX has more cash in the bank: 4.23B vs. FFBSX (322M). FFBSX pays higher dividends than AAOTX: FFBSX (1.58) vs AAOTX (0.84). AAOTX was incepted earlier than FFBSX: AAOTX (5 years) vs FFBSX (6 years). AAOTX (0.74) is less costly to investors than FFBSX (0.50). FFBSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. AAOTX (4.00). FFBSX has a lower initial minimum investment than AAOTX: FFBSX (0) vs AAOTX (250). FFBSX (6.51) and AAOTX (6.33) have marching annual gain over last year. AAOTX return over 5 years is better than : 57.65 vs. FFBSX (54.02).
| AAOTX | FFBSX | AAOTX / FFBSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.50 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.50 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.266 | 0.000 | - |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.23B | 322M | 1,315% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 1.58 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.33 | 6.51 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.27 | 22.92 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.65 | 54.02 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |