Ad is loading...
AAOTX vs FFSZX
AAOTX vs FFSZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AAOTX vs. FFSZX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAOTX is a Hold and FFSZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AAOTX has more cash in the bank: 4.23B vs. FFSZX (1.86B). FFSZX pays higher dividends than AAOTX: FFSZX (1.65) vs AAOTX (0.84). AAOTX was incepted earlier than FFSZX: AAOTX (5 years) vs FFSZX (6 years). AAOTX (0.74) is less costly to investors than FFSZX (0.46). FFSZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. AAOTX (4.00). FFSZX has a lower initial minimum investment than AAOTX: FFSZX (0) vs AAOTX (250). FFSZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.95 vs. AAOTX (6.33). AAOTX return over 5 years is better than : 57.65 vs. FFSZX (53.35).
| AAOTX | FFSZX | AAOTX / FFSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.46 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.46 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.266 | 0.302 | -419% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.23B | 1.86B | 228% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 1.65 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.33 | 6.95 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.27 | 20.58 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.65 | 53.35 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...