Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AAOTX vs FVIPX
AAOTX vs FVIPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AAOTX vs. FVIPX commentary
May 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAOTX is a Hold and FVIPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AAOTX has more cash in the bank: 4.43B vs. FVIPX (2.93B). FVIPX pays higher dividends than AAOTX: FVIPX (1.93) vs AAOTX (0.84). AAOTX was incepted earlier than FVIPX: AAOTX (5 years) vs FVIPX (5 years). AAOTX (0.74) is less costly to investors than FVIPX (0.06). FVIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 7.00 vs. AAOTX (4.00). AAOTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FVIPX: AAOTX (250) vs FVIPX (2000000000). FVIPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.28 vs. AAOTX (8.55).
| AAOTX | FVIPX | AAOTX / FVIPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.06 | 1,233% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.06 | 1,233% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.337 | 4.507 | 74% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.43B | 2.93B | 151% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 1.93 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.55 | 11.28 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.63 | 39.53 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.68 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |