It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AAP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKAR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AAP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KAR’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
AAP (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +8.85% price change this week, while KAR (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was +2.59% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +3.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.53%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was +2.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.37%.
AAP is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.
KAR is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.
OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
@Automotive Aftermarket (+2.87% weekly)The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).
AAP | KAR | AAP / KAR | |
Capitalization | 3.63B | 3.07B | 118% |
EBITDA | -580.08M | 324M | -179% |
Gain YTD | 30.237 | 45.716 | 66% |
P/E Ratio | 58.08 | 39.60 | 147% |
Revenue | 8.74B | 1.86B | 470% |
Total Cash | 1.66B | 119M | 1,392% |
Total Debt | 3.65B | 56.8M | 6,419% |
AAP | KAR | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 4 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 32 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AAP's Valuation (84) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as KAR (86) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that AAP’s stock grew similarly to KAR’s over the last 12 months.
KAR's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for AAP (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that KAR’s stock grew significantly faster than AAP’s over the last 12 months.
KAR's SMR Rating (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as AAP (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that KAR’s stock grew similarly to AAP’s over the last 12 months.
KAR's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as AAP (40) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that KAR’s stock grew similarly to AAP’s over the last 12 months.
KAR's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as AAP (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that KAR’s stock grew similarly to AAP’s over the last 12 months.
AAP | KAR | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago48% | 1 day ago52% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% | 1 day ago71% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago59% | 1 day ago69% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago66% | 1 day ago79% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago69% | 1 day ago66% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | 1 day ago68% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago65% | 8 days ago66% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago67% | 1 day ago69% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% | 1 day ago70% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago63% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AAP has been loosely correlated with CPRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AAP jumps, then CPRT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AAP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AAP | 100% | -0.41% | ||
CPRT - AAP | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
KAR - AAP | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.65% | ||
HVT - AAP | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.62% | ||
HD - AAP | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
HNST - AAP | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KAR has been loosely correlated with CPRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KAR jumps, then CPRT could also see price increases.