AAPI
Price
$5.75
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
LTRCF
Price
$3.35
Change
+$0.27 (+8.77%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
7.75B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AAPI vs LTRCF

Header iconAAPI vs LTRCF Comparison
Open Charts AAPI vs LTRCFBanner chart's image
Apple iSports Group
Price$5.75
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.11K
CapitalizationN/A
LOTTERY
Price$3.35
Change+$0.27 (+8.77%)
Volume$226
Capitalization7.75B
AAPI vs LTRCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AAPI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LTRCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AAPI vs. LTRCF commentary
Jul 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAPI is a Hold and LTRCF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 18, 2025
Stock price -- (AAPI: $5.75 vs. LTRCF: $3.35)
Brand notoriety: AAPI and LTRCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AAPI: 115% vs. LTRCF: 3%
Market capitalization -- AAPI: $0 vs. LTRCF: $7.75B
AAPI [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $0. LTRCF’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $7.75B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $6.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AAPI’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLTRCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AAPI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LTRCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AAPI and LTRCF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AAPI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LTRCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AAPI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LTRCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LTRCF is a better buy in the short-term than AAPI.

Price Growth

AAPI (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а +15.00% price change this week, while LTRCF (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +0.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.34%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (+0.98% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LTRCF YTD gains are higher at: 3.114 vs. AAPI (1.950).
AAPILTRCFAAPI / LTRCF
CapitalizationN/A7.75B-
EBITDAN/A599M-
Gain YTD1.9503.11463%
P/E RatioN/A33.11-
RevenueN/A3.28B-
Total CashN/A542M-
Total DebtN/A2.49B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AAPI: Fundamental Ratings
AAPI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
93
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AAPILTRCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
26%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
20%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
23%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
21%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
50%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AAPI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LTRCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IUSG153.451.10
+0.72%
iShares Core S&P US Growth ETF
UJAN40.830.15
+0.37%
Innovator US Equity Ultra Buff ETF™ Jan
CZAR31.820.05
+0.16%
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF
AGGY43.190.03
+0.07%
WisdomTree Yield Enhanced US Aggt Bd ETF
FCEF22.38-0.01
-0.04%
First Trust Income Opportunity ETF

AAPI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AAPI and MCHVY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AAPI and MCHVY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AAPI
1D Price
Change %
AAPI100%
+0.04%
MCHVY - AAPI
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LTRCF - AAPI
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGHC - AAPI
-13%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%

LTRCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LTRCF and GIGNF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LTRCF and GIGNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LTRCF
1D Price
Change %
LTRCF100%
N/A
GIGNF - LTRCF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
SEGG - LTRCF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
CDRO - LTRCF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
JPOTF - LTRCF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.65%
AAPI - LTRCF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
More