Advertisement
AAPL vs KOSS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAPL is a Buy and KOSS is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AAPL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKOSS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- AAPL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- KOSS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AAPL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KOSS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AAPL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- KOSS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
AAPL (@Computer Peripherals) experienced а +1.92% price change this week, while KOSS (@Computer Peripherals) price change was -4.32% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Peripherals industry was -0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +45.32%.
Reported Earning Dates
AAPL is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
KOSS is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Peripherals (-0.30% weekly)Computer peripherals connect to a computer system to add functionality or to get information from or put information into computers. Think hard disk drive, data storage systems, cloud storage devices, printer and scanner, or mouse, keyboard etc. Some of the major companies operating in the computer peripherals industry include Western Digital Corporation, Seagate Technology PLC, NetApp, Inc., Zebra Technologies Corporation, and Xerox Holdings Corp.
| AAPL | KOSS | AAPL / KOSS | |
| Capitalization | 3.45T | 58.1M | 5,929,432% |
| EBITDA | 142B | -1.39M | -10,193,065% |
| Gain YTD | -6.971 | -15.989 | 44% |
| P/E Ratio | 35.23 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 409B | 12.4M | 3,298,387% |
| Total Cash | 55.4B | 13M | 426,154% |
| Total Debt | 102B | 2.6M | 3,918,556% |
AAPL | KOSS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | 58 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 31 | 93 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 12 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KOSS's Valuation (58) in the Electronics Or Appliances industry is in the same range as AAPL (85) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that KOSS’s stock grew similarly to AAPL’s over the last 12 months.
AAPL's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KOSS (93) in the Electronics Or Appliances industry. This means that AAPL’s stock grew somewhat faster than KOSS’s over the last 12 months.
AAPL's SMR Rating (12) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for KOSS (92) in the Electronics Or Appliances industry. This means that AAPL’s stock grew significantly faster than KOSS’s over the last 12 months.
AAPL's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as KOSS (50) in the Electronics Or Appliances industry. This means that AAPL’s stock grew similarly to KOSS’s over the last 12 months.
AAPL's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KOSS (100) in the Electronics Or Appliances industry. This means that AAPL’s stock grew somewhat faster than KOSS’s over the last 12 months.
| AAPL | KOSS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 61% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 56% | 5 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 69% | 5 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 46% | 5 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 65% | 5 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 62% | 5 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 64% | 12 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 56% | 5 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 58% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 79% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SRV | 43.53 | 0.09 | +0.21% |
| NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund | |||
| FEOE | 44.17 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| FIRST EAGLE OVERSEAS EQUITY ETF | |||
| CGSM | 26.23 | -0.02 | -0.07% |
| Capital Group Short Dur Muncpl Inc ETF | |||
| GABF | 48.98 | -0.13 | -0.26% |
| Gabelli Financial Services Opp ETF | |||
| JEPQ | 55.68 | -0.52 | -0.93% |
| JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Inc ETF | |||
AAPL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AAPL has been loosely correlated with TBCH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AAPL jumps, then TBCH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AAPL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAPL | 100% | -0.18% | ||
| TBCH - AAPL | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.02% | ||
| SONO - AAPL | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| KOSS - AAPL | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.16% | ||
| LPL - AAPL | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.68% | ||
| VUZI - AAPL | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.40% | ||
More | ||||
KOSS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KOSS has been loosely correlated with SONO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KOSS jumps, then SONO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KOSS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KOSS | 100% | -0.16% | ||
| SONO - KOSS | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| AAPL - KOSS | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.18% | ||
| TBCH - KOSS | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.02% | ||
| GPRO - KOSS | 28% Poorly correlated | -6.02% | ||
| VUZI - KOSS | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.40% | ||
More | ||||