Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AASCX vs VIMAX
AASCX vs VIMAX Comparison
Open Charts AASCX vs VIMAX
Thrivent Mid Cap Stock A
Price$29.71
Change-$0.43 (-1.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.56B
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Admiral
Price$335.74
Change-$3.91 (-1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets185.28B
AASCX vs VIMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AASCX vs. VIMAX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AASCX is a StrongBuy and VIMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMAX has more cash in the bank: 185B vs. AASCX (3.57B). VIMAX pays higher dividends than AASCX: VIMAX (1.52) vs AASCX (0.40). AASCX was incepted earlier than VIMAX: AASCX (32 years) vs VIMAX (24 years). AASCX (0.96) is less costly to investors than VIMAX (0.05). AASCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. VIMAX (16.00). AASCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMAX: AASCX (2000) vs VIMAX (3000). VIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.22 vs. AASCX (-1.26). VIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 71.14 vs. AASCX (38.53).
| AASCX | VIMAX | AASCX / VIMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.05 | 1,920% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.05 | 1,920% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.141 | 3.654 | -59% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.57B | 185B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 1.52 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.26 | 12.22 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.49 | 39.75 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.53 | 71.14 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.74 | 117.22 | 31% |