It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AASP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileACBD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AASP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ACBD’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
AASP (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -6.82% price change this week, while ACBD (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.23%.
Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
AASP | ACBD | AASP / ACBD | |
Capitalization | 962K | N/A | - |
EBITDA | -51.65K | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 325.894 | 642.857 | 51% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 0 | N/A | - |
Total Cash | 45.6K | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 3.3M | N/A | - |
AASP | ACBD | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 83 | 20 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 33 Fair valued | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 40 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ACBD's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as AASP (33). This means that ACBD’s stock grew similarly to AASP’s over the last 12 months.
AASP's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACBD (100). This means that AASP’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACBD’s over the last 12 months.
AASP's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ACBD (100). This means that AASP’s stock grew similarly to ACBD’s over the last 12 months.
AASP's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as ACBD (35). This means that AASP’s stock grew similarly to ACBD’s over the last 12 months.
AASP's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ACBD (100). This means that AASP’s stock grew similarly to ACBD’s over the last 12 months.
AASP | ACBD | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago86% | 3 days ago44% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago75% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago66% | 3 days ago64% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago64% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago60% | 3 days ago50% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago57% | 3 days ago38% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago64% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago76% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago58% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago69% | 3 days ago39% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
MXREX | 13.25 | N/A | N/A |
Empower Real Estate Index Inv | |||
GCPCX | 20.06 | -0.04 | -0.20% |
Gateway Equity Call Premium C | |||
FFNCX | 13.21 | -0.03 | -0.23% |
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% C | |||
RRCOX | 59.35 | -0.26 | -0.44% |
T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research R | |||
GFSIX | 15.97 | -0.21 | -1.30% |
Gabelli Global Financial Services I |
A.I.dvisor tells us that AASP and LBEV have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AASP and LBEV's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AASP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AASP | 100% | +35.14% | ||
LBEV - AASP | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
BLEUU - AASP | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
DIST - AASP | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
GLACU - AASP | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
ACBD - AASP | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that ACBD and CLRC have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACBD and CLRC's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACBD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ACBD | 100% | N/A | ||
CLRC - ACBD | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
GGAAF - ACBD | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
HYAC - ACBD | 16% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
AASP - ACBD | 4% Poorly correlated | +35.14% | ||
ADMG - ACBD | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |