AASP
Price
$2.05
Change
-$0.45 (-18.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
ACBD
Price
$2.60
Change
+$0.74 (+39.78%)
Updated
Dec 6 closing price
Ad is loading...

AASP vs ACBD

Header iconAASP vs ACBD Comparison
Open Charts AASP vs ACBDBanner chart's image
Global Acquisitions
Price$2.05
Change-$0.45 (-18.00%)
Volume$5.48K
CapitalizationN/A
Annabidiol
Price$2.60
Change+$0.74 (+39.78%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
AASP vs ACBD Comparison Chart
Loading...
AASP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ACBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AASP vs. ACBD commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AASP is a Hold and ACBD is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (AASP: $2.05 vs. ACBD: $2.60)
Brand notoriety: AASP and ACBD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AASP: 103% vs. ACBD: 52%
Market capitalization -- AASP: $961.88K vs. ACBD: $0
AASP [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $961.88K. ACBD’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $2.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AASP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileACBD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AASP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ACBD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AASP is a better buy in the long-term than ACBD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AASP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ACBD’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AASP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ACBD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AASP is a better buy in the short-term than ACBD.

Price Growth

AASP (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -6.82% price change this week, while ACBD (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.23%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.78% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACBD YTD gains are higher at: 642.857 vs. AASP (325.894).
AASPACBDAASP / ACBD
Capitalization962KN/A-
EBITDA-51.65KN/A-
Gain YTD325.894642.85751%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash45.6KN/A-
Total Debt3.3MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AASP vs ACBD: Fundamental Ratings
AASP
ACBD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8320
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
40100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3435
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ACBD's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as AASP (33). This means that ACBD’s stock grew similarly to AASP’s over the last 12 months.

AASP's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACBD (100). This means that AASP’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACBD’s over the last 12 months.

AASP's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ACBD (100). This means that AASP’s stock grew similarly to ACBD’s over the last 12 months.

AASP's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as ACBD (35). This means that AASP’s stock grew similarly to ACBD’s over the last 12 months.

AASP's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ACBD (100). This means that AASP’s stock grew similarly to ACBD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AASPACBD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
64%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
76%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AASP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ACBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MXREX13.25N/A
N/A
Empower Real Estate Index Inv
GCPCX20.06-0.04
-0.20%
Gateway Equity Call Premium C
FFNCX13.21-0.03
-0.23%
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% C
RRCOX59.35-0.26
-0.44%
T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research R
GFSIX15.97-0.21
-1.30%
Gabelli Global Financial Services I

AASP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AASP and LBEV have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AASP and LBEV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AASP
1D Price
Change %
AASP100%
+35.14%
LBEV - AASP
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLEUU - AASP
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DIST - AASP
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLACU - AASP
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACBD - AASP
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

ACBD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACBD and CLRC have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACBD and CLRC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACBD
1D Price
Change %
ACBD100%
N/A
CLRC - ACBD
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GGAAF - ACBD
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HYAC - ACBD
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AASP - ACBD
4%
Poorly correlated
+35.14%
ADMG - ACBD
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More