Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AATSX vs FTHFX
AATSX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts AATSX vs FTHFX
Ancora/Thelen Small-Mid Cap S
Price$20.04
Change-$0.19 (-0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets218.9M
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.57
Change-$0.39 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.28B
AATSX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AATSX vs. FTHFX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AATSX is a Hold and FTHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. AATSX (219M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than AATSX: FTHFX (0.70) vs AATSX (0.36). AATSX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: AATSX (10 years) vs FTHFX (14 years). AATSX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). AATSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.19 vs. FTHFX (41.00). FTHFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AATSX: FTHFX (1000000) vs AATSX (1500000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.10 vs. AATSX (0.27). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 113.38 vs. AATSX (49.96).
| AATSX | FTHFX | AATSX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.63 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.63 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.903 | 9.996 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500000 | 1000000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219M | 11.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 0.70 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.27 | 3.10 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.88 | 64.07 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.96 | 113.38 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.54 | 188.90 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement