Ad is loading...
AATSX vs FTHFX
AATSX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts AATSX vs FTHFX
Ancora/Thelen Small-Mid Cap S
Price$17.34
Change+$0.30 (+1.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets177.88M
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$41.58
Change+$0.83 (+2.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.26B
AATSX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AATSX vs. FTHFX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AATSX is a Buy and FTHFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.26B vs. AATSX (178M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than AATSX: FTHFX (0.82) vs AATSX (0.40). AATSX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: AATSX (10 years) vs FTHFX (14 years). AATSX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). AATSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.19 vs. FTHFX (41.00). FTHFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AATSX: FTHFX (1000000) vs AATSX (1500000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.97 vs. AATSX (-10.17). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 97.43 vs. AATSX (50.58).
| AATSX | FTHFX | AATSX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.63 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.63 | 195% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.303 | -11.184 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500000 | 1000000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 178M | 9.26B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 0.82 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.17 | -8.97 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.16 | 21.34 | 19% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.58 | 97.43 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 76.65 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...