Ad is loading...
AATSX vs FTHFX
AATSX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts AATSX vs FTHFX
Ancora/Thelen Small-Mid Cap S
Price$21.37
Change-$0.24 (-1.11%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$52.18
Change-$0.55 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
AATSX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AATSX vs. FTHFX commentary
Nov 15, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AATSX is a Buy and FTHFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. AATSX (200M). AATSX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: AATSX (1.03) vs FTHFX (0.95). AATSX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: AATSX (9 years) vs FTHFX (13 years). AATSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.30 vs. FTHFX (35.00). FTHFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AATSX: FTHFX (1000000) vs AATSX (1500000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.40 vs. AATSX (33.10). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 103.89 vs. AATSX (42.27).
| AATSX | FTHFX | AATSX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.506 | 25.667 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500000 | 1000000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 200M | 11.2B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.95 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.10 | 37.40 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.28 | 36.35 | -9% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.27 | 103.89 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 121.49 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...