Ad is loading...
AATSX vs FTHFX
AATSX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts AATSX vs FTHFX
Ancora/Thelen Small-Mid Cap S
Price$20.36
Change+$0.06 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets201.65M
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.77
Change-$0.10 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.78B
AATSX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AATSX vs. FTHFX commentary
Jan 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AATSX is a Hold and FTHFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. AATSX (202M). AATSX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: AATSX (1.03) vs FTHFX (0.95). AATSX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: AATSX (10 years) vs FTHFX (13 years). AATSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.30 vs. FTHFX (35.00). FTHFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AATSX: FTHFX (1000000) vs AATSX (1500000). AATSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.76 vs. FTHFX (14.05). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 80.77 vs. AATSX (30.41).
| AATSX | FTHFX | AATSX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.263 | 5.394 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500000 | 1000000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 202M | 10.8B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.95 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.76 | 14.05 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.64 | 39.98 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.41 | 80.77 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 116.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...