Ad is loading...
AAUTX vs RMFCX
AAUTX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts AAUTX vs RMFCX
Thrivent Large Cap Value A
Price$25.87
Change-$0.40 (-1.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.32B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$50.23
Change-$0.51 (-1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.16B
AAUTX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AAUTX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAUTX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 93.2B vs. AAUTX (2.32B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than AAUTX: RMFCX (1.34) vs AAUTX (1.23). AAUTX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: AAUTX (25 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than AAUTX (0.84). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. AAUTX (29.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than AAUTX: RMFCX (250) vs AAUTX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.25 vs. AAUTX (-11.76). AAUTX (47.26) and RMFCX (45.42) have equivalent 5 years return.
| AAUTX | RMFCX | AAUTX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.91 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.91 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.577 | -7.697 | 124% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.32B | 93.2B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 1.34 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.76 | -4.25 | 277% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.97 | -0.65 | 764% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.26 | 45.42 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.76 | 46.29 | 82% |