AAVMY
Price
$29.38
Change
-$0.10 (-0.34%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
24.29B
ACGBY
Price
$17.50
Change
+$0.17 (+0.98%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
347.86B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AAVMY vs ACGBY

Header iconAAVMY vs ACGBY Comparison
Open Charts AAVMY vs ACGBYBanner chart's image
Abn Amro BK N V
Price$29.38
Change-$0.10 (-0.34%)
Volume$6.77K
Capitalization24.29B
Agricultural Bank of China
Price$17.50
Change+$0.17 (+0.98%)
Volume$12.38K
Capitalization347.86B
AAVMY vs ACGBY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AAVMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ACGBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AAVMY vs. ACGBY commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAVMY is a Buy and ACGBY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (AAVMY: $29.38 vs. ACGBY: $17.50)
Brand notoriety: AAVMY and ACGBY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AAVMY: 64% vs. ACGBY: 39%
Market capitalization -- AAVMY: $24.29B vs. ACGBY: $347.86B
AAVMY [@Major Banks] is valued at $24.29B. ACGBY’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $347.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $809.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $131.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AAVMY’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileACGBY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • AAVMY’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • ACGBY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, AAVMY is a better buy in the long-term than ACGBY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AAVMY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ACGBY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AAVMY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ACGBY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ACGBY is a better buy in the short-term than AAVMY.

Price Growth

AAVMY (@Major Banks) experienced а +2.12% price change this week, while ACGBY (@Major Banks) price change was +4.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +128.15%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-0.01% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACGBY($348B) has a higher market cap than AAVMY($24.3B). AAVMY has higher P/E ratio than ACGBY: AAVMY (9.75) vs ACGBY (6.66). AAVMY YTD gains are higher at: 111.482 vs. ACGBY (32.809). ACGBY has higher revenues than AAVMY: ACGBY (711B) vs AAVMY (8.75B).
AAVMYACGBYAAVMY / ACGBY
Capitalization24.3B348B7%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD111.48232.809340%
P/E Ratio9.756.66146%
Revenue8.75B711B1%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AAVMY vs ACGBY: Fundamental Ratings
AAVMY
ACGBY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2669
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
45
SMR RATING
1..100
61
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4046
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1115
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
20n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AAVMY's Valuation (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACGBY (70). This means that AAVMY’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACGBY’s over the last 12 months.

AAVMY's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as ACGBY (5). This means that AAVMY’s stock grew similarly to ACGBY’s over the last 12 months.

ACGBY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as AAVMY (6). This means that ACGBY’s stock grew similarly to AAVMY’s over the last 12 months.

AAVMY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as ACGBY (46). This means that AAVMY’s stock grew similarly to ACGBY’s over the last 12 months.

AAVMY's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as ACGBY (15). This means that AAVMY’s stock grew similarly to ACGBY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AAVMYACGBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
44%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AAVMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ACGBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HNT.X2.3329190.017358
+0.75%
Helium cryptocurrency
TMSL35.030.14
+0.39%
T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF
FLEU31.050.07
+0.21%
Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF
BKGI38.060.04
+0.11%
BNY Mellon Global Infras Inc ETF
NJUN30.400.03
+0.09%
Innovator Growth-100 Pwr Buffr ETF - Jun

AAVMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AAVMY has been loosely correlated with ING. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AAVMY jumps, then ING could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AAVMY
1D Price
Change %
AAVMY100%
-0.34%
ING - AAVMY
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.03%
SAN - AAVMY
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
BCS - AAVMY
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.99%
SCBFY - AAVMY
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.14%
MUFG - AAVMY
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.72%
More

ACGBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACGBY has been closely correlated with IDCBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ACGBY jumps, then IDCBY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACGBY
1D Price
Change %
ACGBY100%
+0.95%
IDCBY - ACGBY
77%
Closely correlated
+0.80%
CICHY - ACGBY
74%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
BACHY - ACGBY
69%
Closely correlated
+0.36%
CICHF - ACGBY
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
AAVMY - ACGBY
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
More