It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AAVMY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileACGBY’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AAVMY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ACGBY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
AAVMY (@Major Banks) experienced а -3.94% price change this week, while ACGBY (@Major Banks) price change was +0.52% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -1.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.01%.
Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.
AAVMY | ACGBY | AAVMY / ACGBY | |
Capitalization | 14.8B | 174B | 9% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 15.363 | 50.559 | 30% |
P/E Ratio | 6.82 | 3.61 | 189% |
Revenue | 7.99B | 729B | 1% |
Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 65.2B | N/A | - |
ACGBY | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 11 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 4 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 1 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 30 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AAVMY | ACGBY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago49% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago47% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago60% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago58% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 2 days ago57% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 2 days ago60% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago66% | 2 days ago58% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 6 days ago46% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago71% | 2 days ago52% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago57% | 2 days ago61% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
JHBCX | 67.72 | N/A | N/A |
JHancock Blue Chip Growth NAV | |||
ABCIX | 23.92 | -0.08 | -0.33% |
American Beacon The London Co Inc Eq R5 | |||
PDAVX | 11.98 | -0.07 | -0.58% |
PineBridge Dynamic Asset Allc Invt Svcng | |||
GLEIX | 13.46 | -0.08 | -0.59% |
GS Energy Infrastructure Fd Inv Shares | |||
UPAAX | 14.92 | -0.23 | -1.52% |
Upright Assets Allocation Plus |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AAVMY has been loosely correlated with ING. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AAVMY jumps, then ING could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AAVMY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AAVMY | 100% | -0.77% | ||
ING - AAVMY | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.22% | ||
SAN - AAVMY | 44% Loosely correlated | -4.30% | ||
BCS - AAVMY | 42% Loosely correlated | -2.49% | ||
SCBFY - AAVMY | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.39% | ||
MUFG - AAVMY | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.67% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACGBY has been closely correlated with IDCBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ACGBY jumps, then IDCBY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACGBY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ACGBY | 100% | +0.74% | ||
IDCBY - ACGBY | 77% Closely correlated | +0.93% | ||
CICHY - ACGBY | 74% Closely correlated | -0.31% | ||
BACHY - ACGBY | 69% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
CICHF - ACGBY | 22% Poorly correlated | +4.57% | ||
AAVMY - ACGBY | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.77% | ||
More |