AAVMY
Price
$15.10
Change
-$0.12 (-0.79%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
ACGBY
Price
$13.43
Change
+$0.10 (+0.75%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

AAVMY vs ACGBY

Header iconAAVMY vs ACGBY Comparison
Open Charts AAVMY vs ACGBYBanner chart's image
Abn Amro BK N V
Price$15.10
Change-$0.12 (-0.79%)
Volume$45.27K
CapitalizationN/A
Agricultural Bank of China
Price$13.43
Change+$0.10 (+0.75%)
Volume$14.17K
CapitalizationN/A
AAVMY vs ACGBY Comparison Chart
Loading...
AAVMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ACGBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AAVMY vs. ACGBY commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAVMY is a StrongBuy and ACGBY is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (AAVMY: $15.10 vs. ACGBY: $13.43)
Brand notoriety: AAVMY and ACGBY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AAVMY: 164% vs. ACGBY: 103%
Market capitalization -- AAVMY: $14.75B vs. ACGBY: $173.61B
AAVMY [@Major Banks] is valued at $14.75B. ACGBY’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $173.61B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AAVMY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileACGBY’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • AAVMY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • ACGBY’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, ACGBY is a better buy in the long-term than AAVMY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AAVMY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ACGBY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AAVMY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ACGBY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ACGBY is a better buy in the short-term than AAVMY.

Price Growth

AAVMY (@Major Banks) experienced а -3.94% price change this week, while ACGBY (@Major Banks) price change was +0.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -1.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-1.71% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACGBY($174B) has a higher market cap than AAVMY($14.8B). AAVMY has higher P/E ratio than ACGBY: AAVMY (6.82) vs ACGBY (3.61). ACGBY YTD gains are higher at: 50.559 vs. AAVMY (15.363). ACGBY has higher revenues than AAVMY: ACGBY (729B) vs AAVMY (7.99B).
AAVMYACGBYAAVMY / ACGBY
Capitalization14.8B174B9%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD15.36350.55930%
P/E Ratio6.823.61189%
Revenue7.99B729B1%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt65.2BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACGBY: Fundamental Ratings
ACGBY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
76
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4
SMR RATING
1..100
1
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
30
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AAVMYACGBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AAVMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ACGBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JHBCX67.72N/A
N/A
JHancock Blue Chip Growth NAV
ABCIX23.92-0.08
-0.33%
American Beacon The London Co Inc Eq R5
PDAVX11.98-0.07
-0.58%
PineBridge Dynamic Asset Allc Invt Svcng
GLEIX13.46-0.08
-0.59%
GS Energy Infrastructure Fd Inv Shares
UPAAX14.92-0.23
-1.52%
Upright Assets Allocation Plus

AAVMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AAVMY has been loosely correlated with ING. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AAVMY jumps, then ING could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AAVMY
1D Price
Change %
AAVMY100%
-0.77%
ING - AAVMY
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.22%
SAN - AAVMY
44%
Loosely correlated
-4.30%
BCS - AAVMY
42%
Loosely correlated
-2.49%
SCBFY - AAVMY
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.39%
MUFG - AAVMY
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.67%
More

ACGBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACGBY has been closely correlated with IDCBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ACGBY jumps, then IDCBY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACGBY
1D Price
Change %
ACGBY100%
+0.74%
IDCBY - ACGBY
77%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
CICHY - ACGBY
74%
Closely correlated
-0.31%
BACHY - ACGBY
69%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
CICHF - ACGBY
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.57%
AAVMY - ACGBY
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.77%
More