AAVMY
Price
$31.71
Change
-$0.09 (-0.28%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
26.04B
BCLYF
Price
$5.01
Change
-$0.08 (-1.57%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
71.33B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AAVMY vs BCLYF

Header iconAAVMY vs BCLYF Comparison
Open Charts AAVMY vs BCLYFBanner chart's image
Abn Amro BK N V
Price$31.71
Change-$0.09 (-0.28%)
Volume$7.65K
Capitalization26.04B
Barclays
Price$5.01
Change-$0.08 (-1.57%)
Volume$25.06K
Capitalization71.33B
AAVMY vs BCLYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AAVMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BCLYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AAVMY vs. BCLYF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAVMY is a Buy and BCLYF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (AAVMY: $31.71 vs. BCLYF: $5.01)
Brand notoriety: AAVMY and BCLYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AAVMY: 62% vs. BCLYF: 87%
Market capitalization -- AAVMY: $26.04B vs. BCLYF: $71.33B
AAVMY [@Major Banks] is valued at $26.04B. BCLYF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $71.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $869.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $133.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AAVMY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileBCLYF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AAVMY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • BCLYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, AAVMY is a better buy in the long-term than BCLYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AAVMY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BCLYF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AAVMY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • BCLYF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AAVMY is a better buy in the short-term than BCLYF.

Price Growth

AAVMY (@Major Banks) experienced а +4.65% price change this week, while BCLYF (@Major Banks) price change was -2.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +130.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-0.83% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCLYF($71.3B) has a higher market cap than AAVMY($26B). AAVMY has higher P/E ratio than BCLYF: AAVMY (10.45) vs BCLYF (9.19). AAVMY YTD gains are higher at: 133.134 vs. BCLYF (51.269). BCLYF has higher revenues than AAVMY: BCLYF (27.8B) vs AAVMY (8.75B).
AAVMYBCLYFAAVMY / BCLYF
Capitalization26B71.3B36%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD133.13451.269260%
P/E Ratio10.459.19114%
Revenue8.75B27.8B31%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A117B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AAVMY vs BCLYF: Fundamental Ratings
AAVMY
BCLYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
416
SMR RATING
1..100
64
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3944
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1040
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AAVMY's Valuation (39) in the null industry is in the same range as BCLYF (57). This means that AAVMY’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

AAVMY's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as BCLYF (16). This means that AAVMY’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

BCLYF's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as AAVMY (6). This means that BCLYF’s stock grew similarly to AAVMY’s over the last 12 months.

AAVMY's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as BCLYF (44). This means that AAVMY’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

AAVMY's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as BCLYF (40). This means that AAVMY’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AAVMYBCLYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AAVMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BCLYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IBRX2.540.08
+3.25%
ImmunityBio
HOLX67.211.42
+2.16%
Hologic
TCPC6.24-0.07
-1.11%
BlackRock TCP Capital Corp
ICG1.65-0.08
-4.62%
Intchains Group Limited
AIM2.68-0.20
-6.94%
AIM ImmunoTech Inc

AAVMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AAVMY has been loosely correlated with ING. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AAVMY jumps, then ING could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AAVMY
1D Price
Change %
AAVMY100%
-0.28%
ING - AAVMY
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.41%
SAN - AAVMY
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.57%
BCS - AAVMY
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.43%
SCBFY - AAVMY
42%
Loosely correlated
+2.73%
MUFG - AAVMY
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.94%
More

BCLYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCLYF has been loosely correlated with BCS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCLYF jumps, then BCS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCLYF
1D Price
Change %
BCLYF100%
-1.53%
BCS - BCLYF
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.43%
SAN - BCLYF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.57%
ING - BCLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.41%
AAVMY - BCLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
WFC - BCLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
More