AAVMY
Price
$26.36
Change
-$0.01 (-0.04%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
14.75B
BCS
Price
$18.21
Change
+$0.34 (+1.90%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
34.89B
52 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AAVMY vs BCS

Header iconAAVMY vs BCS Comparison
Open Charts AAVMY vs BCSBanner chart's image
Abn Amro BK N V
Price$26.36
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
Volume$2.95K
Capitalization14.75B
Barclays
Price$18.21
Change+$0.34 (+1.90%)
Volume$12.74M
Capitalization34.89B
AAVMY vs BCS Comparison Chart
Loading...
AAVMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AAVMY vs. BCS commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAVMY is a Hold and BCS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (AAVMY: $26.36 vs. BCS: $18.21)
Brand notoriety: AAVMY: Not notable vs. BCS: Notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AAVMY: 20% vs. BCS: 89%
Market capitalization -- AAVMY: $14.75B vs. BCS: $34.89B
AAVMY [@Major Banks] is valued at $14.75B. BCS’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $34.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AAVMY’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileBCS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • AAVMY’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • BCS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AAVMY and BCS are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AAVMY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BCS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AAVMY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • BCS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AAVMY and BCS are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AAVMY (@Major Banks) experienced а +1.93% price change this week, while BCS (@Major Banks) price change was +2.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCS is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.16% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCS($34.9B) has a higher market cap than AAVMY($14.8B). BCS (6.84) and AAVMY (6.82) have similar P/E ratio . AAVMY YTD gains are higher at: 85.878 vs. BCS (39.453). AAVMY has less debt than BCS: AAVMY (65.2B) vs BCS (177B). BCS has higher revenues than AAVMY: BCS (25.4B) vs AAVMY (7.99B).
AAVMYBCSAAVMY / BCS
Capitalization14.8B34.9B42%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD85.87839.453218%
P/E Ratio6.826.84100%
Revenue7.99B25.4B31%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt65.2B177B37%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AAVMY vs BCS: Fundamental Ratings
AAVMY
BCS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3028
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
510
SMR RATING
1..100
43
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3640
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1245
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AAVMY's Valuation (19) in the null industry is in the same range as BCS (19) in the Major Banks industry. This means that AAVMY’s stock grew similarly to BCS’s over the last 12 months.

AAVMY's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as BCS (10) in the Major Banks industry. This means that AAVMY’s stock grew similarly to BCS’s over the last 12 months.

BCS's SMR Rating (3) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as AAVMY (4) in the null industry. This means that BCS’s stock grew similarly to AAVMY’s over the last 12 months.

AAVMY's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as BCS (40) in the Major Banks industry. This means that AAVMY’s stock grew similarly to BCS’s over the last 12 months.

AAVMY's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCS (45) in the Major Banks industry. This means that AAVMY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AAVMYBCS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AAVMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ABCL2.440.07
+2.95%
AbCellera Biologics
BJ111.112.05
+1.88%
BJs Wholesale Club Holdings
GPOR191.022.47
+1.31%
Gulfport Energy Corp
EM1.090.01
+0.93%
Smart Share Global Limited
CVM2.380.02
+0.85%
Cel-Sci Corp

AAVMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AAVMY has been loosely correlated with ING. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AAVMY jumps, then ING could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AAVMY
1D Price
Change %
AAVMY100%
-0.04%
ING - AAVMY
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
SAN - AAVMY
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.63%
BCS - AAVMY
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.90%
SCBFY - AAVMY
42%
Loosely correlated
+3.21%
MUFG - AAVMY
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
More