AAVMY
Price
$30.39
Change
-$0.04 (-0.13%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
25B
SCBFY
Price
$39.16
Change
+$0.19 (+0.49%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
44.39B
41 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AAVMY vs SCBFY

Header iconAAVMY vs SCBFY Comparison
Open Charts AAVMY vs SCBFYBanner chart's image
Abn Amro BK N V
Price$30.39
Change-$0.04 (-0.13%)
Volume$16.08K
Capitalization25B
Standard Chartered
Price$39.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.49%)
Volume$65.34K
Capitalization44.39B
AAVMY vs SCBFY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AAVMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCBFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AAVMY vs. SCBFY commentary
Sep 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAVMY is a Buy and SCBFY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 19, 2025
Stock price -- (AAVMY: $30.37 vs. SCBFY: $38.95)
Brand notoriety: AAVMY and SCBFY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AAVMY: 69% vs. SCBFY: 49%
Market capitalization -- AAVMY: $25B vs. SCBFY: $44.39B
AAVMY [@Major Banks] is valued at $25B. SCBFY’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $44.39B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $861.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $134.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AAVMY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSCBFY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • AAVMY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SCBFY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, AAVMY is a better buy in the long-term than SCBFY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AAVMY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCBFY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AAVMY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SCBFY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCBFY is a better buy in the short-term than AAVMY.

Price Growth

AAVMY (@Major Banks) experienced а +0.45% price change this week, while SCBFY (@Major Banks) price change was +0.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +131.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

SCBFY is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+0.58% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCBFY($44.4B) has a higher market cap than AAVMY($25B). SCBFY has higher P/E ratio than AAVMY: SCBFY (10.71) vs AAVMY (9.90). AAVMY YTD gains are higher at: 123.253 vs. SCBFY (60.051). SCBFY has higher revenues than AAVMY: SCBFY (20.5B) vs AAVMY (8.75B).
AAVMYSCBFYAAVMY / SCBFY
Capitalization25B44.4B56%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD123.25360.051205%
P/E Ratio9.9010.7192%
Revenue8.75B20.5B43%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A99.4B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AAVMY vs SCBFY: Fundamental Ratings
AAVMY
SCBFY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2018
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
47
SMR RATING
1..100
66
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4040
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1127
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AAVMY's Valuation (35) in the null industry is in the same range as SCBFY (63). This means that AAVMY’s stock grew similarly to SCBFY’s over the last 12 months.

AAVMY's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as SCBFY (7). This means that AAVMY’s stock grew similarly to SCBFY’s over the last 12 months.

AAVMY's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as SCBFY (6). This means that AAVMY’s stock grew similarly to SCBFY’s over the last 12 months.

AAVMY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as SCBFY (40). This means that AAVMY’s stock grew similarly to SCBFY’s over the last 12 months.

AAVMY's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as SCBFY (27). This means that AAVMY’s stock grew similarly to SCBFY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AAVMYSCBFY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AAVMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCBFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QVCGP8.900.39
+4.58%
QVC Group Inc.
HRMY32.630.57
+1.78%
Harmony Biosciences Holdings
DINO53.110.48
+0.91%
HF Sinclair Corp
VSTA4.95-0.01
-0.10%
Vasta Platform Limited
XPL0.73-0.02
-3.19%
Solitario Resources Corp

AAVMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AAVMY has been loosely correlated with ING. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AAVMY jumps, then ING could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AAVMY
1D Price
Change %
AAVMY100%
-0.08%
ING - AAVMY
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
SAN - AAVMY
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
BCS - AAVMY
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.16%
SCBFY - AAVMY
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
MUFG - AAVMY
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
More

SCBFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCBFY has been loosely correlated with HSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCBFY jumps, then HSBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCBFY
1D Price
Change %
SCBFY100%
-0.54%
HSBC - SCBFY
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
BCS - SCBFY
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.16%
ING - SCBFY
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
SAN - SCBFY
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
SCBFF - SCBFY
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
More