AB
Price
$41.10
Change
-$0.14 (-0.34%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.98B
20 days until earnings call
MGLD
Price
$0.78
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
49.69M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AB vs MGLD

Header iconAB vs MGLD Comparison
Open Charts AB vs MGLDBanner chart's image
AllianceBernstein Holding
Price$41.10
Change-$0.14 (-0.34%)
Volume$157.74K
Capitalization3.98B
Marygold Companies (The)
Price$0.78
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.86K
Capitalization49.69M
AB vs MGLD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AB vs. MGLD commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AB is a StrongBuy and MGLD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (AB: $41.10 vs. MGLD: $0.78)
Brand notoriety: AB and MGLD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AB: 70% vs. MGLD: 48%
Market capitalization -- AB: $3.98B vs. MGLD: $49.69M
AB [@Investment Managers] is valued at $3.98B. MGLD’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $49.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMGLD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MGLD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AB is a better buy in the long-term than MGLD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGLD’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MGLD’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AB is a better buy in the short-term than MGLD.

Price Growth

AB (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.49% price change this week, while MGLD (@Investment Managers) price change was -14.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

AB is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

MGLD is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AB($3.98B) has a higher market cap than MGLD($49.7M). MGLD has higher P/E ratio than AB: MGLD (88.83) vs AB (14.71). AB YTD gains are higher at: 16.268 vs. MGLD (-55.682). AB has higher revenues than MGLD: AB (300M) vs MGLD (33.9M).
ABMGLDAB / MGLD
Capitalization3.98B49.7M8,000%
EBITDAN/A-983.96K-
Gain YTD16.268-55.682-29%
P/E Ratio14.7188.8317%
Revenue300M33.9M885%
Total CashN/A18.6M-
Total DebtN/A1.73M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AB vs MGLD: Fundamental Ratings
AB
MGLD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1284
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10094
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4789
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
812
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AB's Valuation (11) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for MGLD (82) in the null industry. This means that AB’s stock grew significantly faster than MGLD’s over the last 12 months.

AB's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as MGLD (100) in the null industry. This means that AB’s stock grew similarly to MGLD’s over the last 12 months.

MGLD's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as AB (100) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that MGLD’s stock grew similarly to AB’s over the last 12 months.

AB's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGLD (89) in the null industry. This means that AB’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGLD’s over the last 12 months.

MGLD's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AB (81) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that MGLD’s stock grew significantly faster than AB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ABMGLD
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
62%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
55%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LINFX21.56N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett International Opp F
MWOGX49.76N/A
N/A
MFS Global Growth R1
FZAHX217.23N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opps Z
NDVVX18.12N/A
N/A
MFS New Discovery Value R6
GLNCX21.78N/A
N/A
MFS Global New Discovery C

MGLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGLD and GLAD have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGLD and GLAD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGLD
1D Price
Change %
MGLD100%
N/A
GLAD - MGLD
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
RAND - MGLD
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
DHIL - MGLD
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
MRCC - MGLD
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.25%
AB - MGLD
18%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
More