Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABASX vs SSGSX
ABASX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts ABASX vs SSGSX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$44.46
Change+$0.08 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.98B
ABASX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABASX vs. SSGSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABASX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 4.98B vs. ABASX (2.21B). ABASX (0.50) and SSGSX (0.49) have matching dividends . ABASX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: ABASX (25 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than ABASX (1.09). ABASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX initial investment is less costly to investors than ABASX (4%) vs ABASX (4%). ABASX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -14.44 vs. ABASX (-16.65). ABASX return over 5 years is better than : 9.00 vs. SSGSX (2.06).
| ABASX | SSGSX | ABASX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.26 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.26 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.411 | -4.415 | 55% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 74% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.21B | 4.98B | 44% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.49 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.65 | -14.44 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.15 | -10.47 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.00 | 2.06 | 436% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.85 | 12.64 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement