Ad is loading...
ABASX vs SSGSX
ABASX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts ABASX vs SSGSX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$43.60
Change+$0.57 (+1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.8B
ABASX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABASX vs. SSGSX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABASX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.8B vs. ABASX (2.24B). ABASX (0.53) and SSGSX (0.52) have matching dividends . ABASX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: ABASX (24 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than ABASX (1.10). ABASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX initial investment is less costly to investors than ABASX (4%) vs ABASX (4%). ABASX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.13 vs. ABASX (-13.90). ABASX return over 5 years is better than : 67.60 vs. SSGSX (49.15).
| ABASX | SSGSX | ABASX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.26 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.26 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.834 | -7.323 | 80% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 74% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.24B | 5.8B | 39% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.52 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.90 | -10.13 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | -16.82 | -12.11 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.60 | 49.15 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.74 | 9.81 | -28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...