ABCL
Price
$4.17
Change
-$0.13 (-3.02%)
Updated
Aug 29, 03:47 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.3B
74 days until earnings call
INMB
Price
$2.04
Change
-$0.05 (-2.39%)
Updated
Aug 29, 04:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
55.56M
61 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ABCL vs INMB

Header iconABCL vs INMB Comparison
Open Charts ABCL vs INMBBanner chart's image
AbCellera Biologics
Price$4.17
Change-$0.13 (-3.02%)
Volume$900
Capitalization1.3B
INmune Bio
Price$2.04
Change-$0.05 (-2.39%)
Volume$1.95K
Capitalization55.56M
ABCL vs INMB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ABCL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
INMB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ABCL vs. INMB commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABCL is a Hold and INMB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (ABCL: $4.30 vs. INMB: $2.09)
Brand notoriety: ABCL and INMB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Biotechnology industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ABCL: 41% vs. INMB: 14%
Market capitalization -- ABCL: $1.3B vs. INMB: $55.56M
ABCL [@Biotechnology] is valued at $1.3B. INMB’s [@Biotechnology] market capitalization is $55.56M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $100.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $1.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ABCL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileINMB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ABCL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • INMB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ABCL is a better buy in the long-term than INMB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ABCL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INMB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ABCL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • INMB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, INMB is a better buy in the short-term than ABCL.

Price Growth

ABCL (@Biotechnology) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while INMB (@Biotechnology) price change was -11.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was -0.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

ABCL is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

INMB is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Biotechnology (-0.74% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ABCL($1.3B) has a higher market cap than INMB($55.6M). ABCL YTD gains are higher at: 46.758 vs. INMB (-55.246). INMB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -39.72M vs. ABCL (-197.92M). ABCL has more cash in the bank: 553M vs. INMB (33.4M). INMB has less debt than ABCL: INMB (451K) vs ABCL (142M). ABCL has higher revenues than INMB: ABCL (32.9M) vs INMB (50K).
ABCLINMBABCL / INMB
Capitalization1.3B55.6M2,338%
EBITDA-197.92M-39.72M498%
Gain YTD46.758-55.246-85%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue32.9M50K65,800%
Total Cash553M33.4M1,656%
Total Debt142M451K31,486%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
INMB: Fundamental Ratings
INMB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
83
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
97
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ABCLINMB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ABCL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
INMB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CNLTN32.050.33
+1.04%
Connecticut Light & Power Co. (The)
AHFCF0.52N/A
N/A
Flow Cap Corp.
WDGJY1.00N/A
N/A
Wood Group (John) Plc.
BRGAY34.34N/A
N/A
Borregaard AS
KAKKF14.45N/A
N/A
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd.

ABCL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ABCL has been loosely correlated with RXRX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ABCL jumps, then RXRX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ABCL
1D Price
Change %
ABCL100%
-1.15%
RXRX - ABCL
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
CRSP - ABCL
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.90%
VCYT - ABCL
56%
Loosely correlated
+4.68%
ABSI - ABCL
53%
Loosely correlated
-3.14%
BEAM - ABCL
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
More

INMB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INMB has been loosely correlated with ORMP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INMB jumps, then ORMP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INMB
1D Price
Change %
INMB100%
+2.20%
ORMP - INMB
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
AXON - INMB
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.59%
PROK - INMB
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
CGEN - INMB
34%
Loosely correlated
-4.76%
ABCL - INMB
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.15%
More