ABCP
Price
$0.41
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
20 days until earnings call
SIUDF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 28 closing price
Ad is loading...

ABCP vs SIUDF

Header iconABCP vs SIUDF Comparison
Open Charts ABCP vs SIUDFBanner chart's image
AmBase
Price$0.41
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$57.5K
CapitalizationN/A
Shanghai Industrial Urban Development Group
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$800
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
ABCP vs SIUDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
ABCP vs. SIUDF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABCP is a Hold and SIUDF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (ABCP: $0.35 vs. SIUDF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: ABCP and SIUDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ABCP: 8% vs. SIUDF: 100%
Market capitalization -- ABCP: $4.95M vs. SIUDF: $276.43M
ABCP [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $4.95M. SIUDF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $276.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ABCP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSIUDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ABCP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SIUDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ABCP is a better buy in the long-term than SIUDF.

Price Growth

ABCP (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -5.74% price change this week, while SIUDF (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

ABCP is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+4.20% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SIUDF($276M) has a higher market cap than ABCP($4.95M). ABCP YTD gains are higher at: 132.500 vs. SIUDF (33.600). SIUDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.52B vs. ABCP (-3.55M). SIUDF has more cash in the bank: 8.81B vs. ABCP (44K). ABCP has less debt than SIUDF: ABCP (300K) vs SIUDF (20.3B). SIUDF has higher revenues than ABCP: SIUDF (13.2B) vs ABCP (0).
ABCPSIUDFABCP / SIUDF
Capitalization4.95M276M2%
EBITDA-3.55M3.52B-0%
Gain YTD132.50033.600394%
P/E RatioN/A5.33-
Revenue013.2B-
Total Cash44K8.81B0%
Total Debt300K20.3B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ABCP: Fundamental Ratings
ABCP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

ABCP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ABCP and SIUDF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ABCP and SIUDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ABCP
1D Price
Change %
ABCP100%
+1.01%
SIUDF - ABCP
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AGPYF - ABCP
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AANNF - ABCP
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BEKE - ABCP
2%
Poorly correlated
-11.22%
ACAN - ABCP
2%
Poorly correlated
-5.73%
More

SIUDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SIUDF and ABCP have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SIUDF and ABCP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SIUDF
1D Price
Change %
SIUDF100%
N/A
ABCP - SIUDF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
RGSG - SIUDF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSPSF - SIUDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RBLAY - SIUDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NMEHF - SIUDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More