ABG
Price
$247.88
Change
+$4.68 (+1.92%)
Updated
Oct 8 closing price
Capitalization
4.87B
19 days until earnings call
RUSHA
Price
$50.63
Change
+$0.95 (+1.91%)
Updated
Oct 8 closing price
Capitalization
4.02B
20 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ABG vs RUSHA

Header iconABG vs RUSHA Comparison
Open Charts ABG vs RUSHABanner chart's image
Asbury Automotive Group
Price$247.88
Change+$4.68 (+1.92%)
Volume$150.51K
Capitalization4.87B
Rush Enterprises
Price$50.63
Change+$0.95 (+1.91%)
Volume$387.58K
Capitalization4.02B
ABG vs RUSHA Comparison Chart in %
ABG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ABG vs. RUSHA commentary
Oct 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABG is a Buy and RUSHA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 09, 2025
Stock price -- (ABG: $247.88 vs. RUSHA: $50.63)
Brand notoriety: ABG and RUSHA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Automotive Aftermarket industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ABG: 95% vs. RUSHA: 106%
Market capitalization -- ABG: $4.87B vs. RUSHA: $4.02B
ABG [@Automotive Aftermarket] is valued at $4.87B. RUSHA’s [@Automotive Aftermarket] market capitalization is $4.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $49.84B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $3.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ABG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ABG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RUSHA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RUSHA is a better buy in the long-term than ABG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ABG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ABG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RUSHA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RUSHA is a better buy in the short-term than ABG.

Price Growth

ABG (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а -1.30% price change this week, while RUSHA (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was -3.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -3.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

ABG is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

RUSHA is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Automotive Aftermarket (-3.09% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ABG($4.87B) has a higher market cap than RUSHA($4.02B). RUSHA has higher P/E ratio than ABG: RUSHA (14.42) vs ABG (9.07). ABG YTD gains are higher at: 1.996 vs. RUSHA (-6.636). ABG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.06B vs. RUSHA (682M). RUSHA has more cash in the bank: 211M vs. ABG (57.6M). RUSHA has less debt than ABG: RUSHA (1.75B) vs ABG (4.55B). ABG has higher revenues than RUSHA: ABG (17.3B) vs RUSHA (7.69B).
ABGRUSHAABG / RUSHA
Capitalization4.87B4.02B121%
EBITDA1.06B682M155%
Gain YTD1.996-6.636-30%
P/E Ratio9.0714.4263%
Revenue17.3B7.69B225%
Total Cash57.6M211M27%
Total Debt4.55B1.75B260%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ABG vs RUSHA: Fundamental Ratings
ABG
RUSHA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1256
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3124
SMR RATING
1..100
5457
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6080
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8445
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RUSHA's Valuation (33) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ABG (77) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than ABG’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as ABG (31) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to ABG’s over the last 12 months.

ABG's SMR Rating (54) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHA (57) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that ABG’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

ABG's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHA (80) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that ABG’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ABG (84) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than ABG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ABGRUSHA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ABG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCSCX71.74N/A
N/A
Touchstone Large Cap Focused C
MEIGX51.56N/A
N/A
MFS Value R1
AZBAX24.95N/A
N/A
Virtus Small-Cap A
PSMVX12.05N/A
N/A
Principal SmallCap Value II R6
RLAIX21.23N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Latin America I

ABG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ABG has been closely correlated with GPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ABG jumps, then GPI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ABG
1D Price
Change %
ABG100%
+1.92%
GPI - ABG
83%
Closely correlated
-0.94%
AN - ABG
82%
Closely correlated
+0.51%
SAH - ABG
82%
Closely correlated
-0.61%
LAD - ABG
78%
Closely correlated
-0.89%
PAG - ABG
78%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
More

RUSHA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHA has been closely correlated with RUSHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHA jumps, then RUSHB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RUSHA
1D Price
Change %
RUSHA100%
+1.91%
RUSHB - RUSHA
86%
Closely correlated
+2.37%
AN - RUSHA
68%
Closely correlated
+0.51%
ABG - RUSHA
66%
Closely correlated
+1.92%
GPI - RUSHA
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.94%
PAG - RUSHA
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
More