Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABIAX vs HFQRX
ABIAX vs HFQRX Comparison
Open Charts ABIAX vs HFQRX
AB International Value A
Price$18.38
Change-$0.15 (-0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets123.26M
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$7.01
Change-$0.06 (-0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.7B
ABIAX vs HFQRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABIAX vs. HFQRX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABIAX is a Hold and HFQRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 6.7B vs. ABIAX (123M). HFQRX (7.24) and ABIAX (7.22) have matching dividends . ABIAX was incepted earlier than HFQRX: ABIAX (25 years) vs HFQRX (10 years). ABIAX (1.75) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. ABIAX (46.00). ABIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFQRX: ABIAX (2500) vs HFQRX (1000000). ABIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.34 vs. HFQRX (21.39). ABIAX return over 5 years is better than : 71.80 vs. HFQRX (61.04).
| ABIAX | HFQRX | ABIAX / HFQRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.70 | 176% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.70 | 250% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 35.157 | 22.942 | 153% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 123M | 6.7B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.22 | 7.24 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.34 | 21.39 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.58 | 46.60 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.80 | 61.04 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.84 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement