ABIT
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
DSEEY
Price
$6.90
Change
-$0.25 (-3.50%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
11 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ABIT vs DSEEY

Header iconABIT vs DSEEY Comparison
Open Charts ABIT vs DSEEYBanner chart's image
ATHENA BITCOIN GLOBAL
Price$0.03
Change-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Volume$118.13K
CapitalizationN/A
Daiwa Securities Group
Price$6.90
Change-$0.25 (-3.50%)
Volume$9.25K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
ABIT vs DSEEY Comparison Chart
Loading...
ABIT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
ABIT vs. DSEEY commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABIT is a StrongSell and DSEEY is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (ABIT: $0.03 vs. DSEEY: $6.90)
Brand notoriety: ABIT and DSEEY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ABIT: 91% vs. DSEEY: 30%
Market capitalization -- ABIT: $245.67M vs. DSEEY: $7.95B
ABIT [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $245.67M. DSEEY’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $7.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ABIT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDSEEY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ABIT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DSEEY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, DSEEY is a better buy in the long-term than ABIT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ABIT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ABIT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

ABIT (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -23.49% price change this week, while DSEEY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -4.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

DSEEY is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.30% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DSEEY($7.95B) has a higher market cap than ABIT($246M). DSEEY YTD gains are higher at: 5.537 vs. ABIT (-82.412). ABIT has less debt than DSEEY: ABIT (1.07M) vs DSEEY (16.85T). DSEEY has higher revenues than ABIT: DSEEY (571B) vs ABIT (570).
ABITDSEEYABIT / DSEEY
Capitalization246M7.95B3%
EBITDA-2.39MN/A-
Gain YTD-82.4125.537-1,488%
P/E RatioN/A17.39-
Revenue570571B0%
Total Cash304N/A-
Total Debt1.07M16.85T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ABIT vs DSEEY: Fundamental Ratings
ABIT
DSEEY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6331
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9921
SMR RATING
1..100
1001
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9758
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
187
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DSEEY's Valuation (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ABIT (100). This means that DSEEY’s stock grew significantly faster than ABIT’s over the last 12 months.

DSEEY's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ABIT (99). This means that DSEEY’s stock grew significantly faster than ABIT’s over the last 12 months.

DSEEY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ABIT (100). This means that DSEEY’s stock grew significantly faster than ABIT’s over the last 12 months.

DSEEY's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ABIT (97). This means that DSEEY’s stock grew somewhat faster than ABIT’s over the last 12 months.

ABIT's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DSEEY (87). This means that ABIT’s stock grew significantly faster than DSEEY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ABIT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ABIT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

ABIT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ABIT and IVTJF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ABIT and IVTJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ABIT
1D Price
Change %
ABIT100%
+11.28%
IVTJF - ABIT
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HEHSF - ABIT
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EUXTF - ABIT
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNNTF - ABIT
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DSEEY - ABIT
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.68%
More

DSEEY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DSEEY has been loosely correlated with NMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DSEEY jumps, then NMR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DSEEY
1D Price
Change %
DSEEY100%
-2.68%
NMR - DSEEY
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.37%
JPXGY - DSEEY
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.74%
CMSQY - DSEEY
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.21%
AAMTF - DSEEY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HOOD - DSEEY
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.27%
More