Ad is loading...
ABIZX vs JVMCX
ABIZX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts ABIZX vs JVMCX
AMG River Road Mid Cap Value Z
Price$20.13
Change-$0.58 (-2.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets314.03M
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$22.81
Change-$0.77 (-3.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.9B
ABIZX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABIZX vs. JVMCX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABIZX is a Hold and JVMCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 19.9B vs. ABIZX (314M). ABIZX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: ABIZX (0.61) vs JVMCX (0.00). ABIZX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: ABIZX (8 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than ABIZX (0.98). ABIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. JVMCX (47.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ABIZX: JVMCX (1000) vs ABIZX (5000000). ABIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.47 vs. JVMCX (-13.88). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 43.19 vs. ABIZX (-20.75).
| ABIZX | JVMCX | ABIZX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.87 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.88 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.044 | -6.798 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 1000 | 500,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 314M | 19.9B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.47 | -13.88 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.95 | -7.95 | -62% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.75 | 43.19 | -48% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 14.93 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers