ABL vs SOC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABL is a StrongBuy and SOC is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ABL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSOC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ABL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SOC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ABL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SOC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ABL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
- SOC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
ABL (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а +3.37% price change this week, while SOC (@Contract Drilling) price change was -5.46% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +2.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.27%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Contract Drilling industry was -0.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -14.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -27.50%.
Reported Earning Dates
ABL is expected to report earnings on Mar 28, 2025.
SOC is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Life/Health Insurance (+2.29% weekly)Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.
@Contract Drilling (-0.98% weekly)The contract drilling industry includes companies that provide onshore and offshore drilling services to the energy sector. Services are delivered on a contractual or per-fee basis. Customers of this industry include major and independent oil and gas companies. Strong oil demand could potentially boost contract fees. Helmerich & Payne, Inc., Transocean Ltd and Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. are among the major drilling companies in the U.S.
| ABL | SOC | ABL / SOC | |
| Capitalization | 776M | 659M | 118% |
| EBITDA | 23.8M | -4.92M | -484% |
| Gain YTD | 5.875 | -19.039 | -31% |
| P/E Ratio | 76.28 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 66.4M | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 27.8M | 268K | 10,373% |
| Total Debt | 142M | 7.51M | 1,891% |
| ABL | SOC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 21% | 2 days ago 22% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 23% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 34% | 2 days ago 20% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 29% | 2 days ago 29% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 31% | 2 days ago 23% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 10 days ago 51% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 45% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 35% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 21% |
ABL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ABL and SOC have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ABL and SOC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ABL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABL | 100% | +1.91% | ||
| SOC - ABL | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.86% | ||
| GATEU - ABL | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GATE - ABL | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SZZLU - ABL | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.05% | ||
| PLMIU - ABL | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SOC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SOC has been loosely correlated with CXAI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SOC jumps, then CXAI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SOC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOC | 100% | -0.86% | ||
| CXAI - SOC | 41% Loosely correlated | +3.67% | ||
| BORR - SOC | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| PDS - SOC | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.12% | ||
| NBR - SOC | 35% Loosely correlated | -2.40% | ||
| PLMIU - SOC | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||