Ad is loading...
ABMBF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
AGXKF
Price
$1.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 6 closing price
Ad is loading...

ABMBF vs AGXKF

Header iconABMBF vs AGXKF Comparison
Open Charts ABMBF vs AGXKFBanner chart's image
Abcourt Mines
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$36.1K
CapitalizationN/A
Anglo Asian Mining
Price$1.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2K
CapitalizationN/A
ABMBF vs AGXKF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ABMBF vs. AGXKF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABMBF is a Hold and AGXKF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (ABMBF: $0.03 vs. AGXKF: $1.02)
Brand notoriety: ABMBF and AGXKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ABMBF: 169% vs. AGXKF: 117%
Market capitalization -- ABMBF: $12.92M vs. AGXKF: $109.54M
ABMBF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $12.92M. AGXKF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $109.54M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ABMBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileAGXKF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ABMBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • AGXKF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, AGXKF is a better buy in the long-term than ABMBF.

Price Growth

ABMBF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -16.97% price change this week, while AGXKF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AGXKF($110M) has a higher market cap than ABMBF($12.9M). AGXKF has higher P/E ratio than ABMBF: AGXKF (29.94) vs ABMBF (27.32). AGXKF YTD gains are higher at: 33.788 vs. ABMBF (-3.974). AGXKF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 25.4M vs. ABMBF (-22.25M). AGXKF has more cash in the bank: 20.4M vs. ABMBF (3.33M). ABMBF has less debt than AGXKF: ABMBF (2.01M) vs AGXKF (2.71M). AGXKF has higher revenues than ABMBF: AGXKF (84.7M) vs ABMBF (13.9M).
ABMBFAGXKFABMBF / AGXKF
Capitalization12.9M110M12%
EBITDA-22.25M25.4M-88%
Gain YTD-3.97433.788-12%
P/E Ratio27.3229.9491%
Revenue13.9M84.7M16%
Total Cash3.33M20.4M16%
Total Debt2.01M2.71M74%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ABMBF vs AGXKF: Fundamental Ratings
ABMBF
AGXKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10083
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6362
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
403
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3850

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AGXKF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ABMBF (78). This means that AGXKF’s stock grew significantly faster than ABMBF’s over the last 12 months.

AGXKF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ABMBF (100). This means that AGXKF’s stock grew similarly to ABMBF’s over the last 12 months.

AGXKF's SMR Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as ABMBF (100). This means that AGXKF’s stock grew similarly to ABMBF’s over the last 12 months.

AGXKF's Price Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as ABMBF (63). This means that AGXKF’s stock grew similarly to ABMBF’s over the last 12 months.

AGXKF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ABMBF (40). This means that AGXKF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ABMBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TWIO9.24-0.01
-0.05%
Trajan Wealth Income Opportunities ETF
RZB24.93-0.08
-0.32%
Reinsurance Group of America
DIG44.11-0.22
-0.50%
ProShares Ultra Energy
AUSF43.38-0.34
-0.78%
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF
RYLD16.52-0.27
-1.61%
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF

ABMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ABMBF and HWAUF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ABMBF and HWAUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ABMBF
1D Price
Change %
ABMBF100%
N/A
HWAUF - ABMBF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.88%
ACKRF - ABMBF
16%
Poorly correlated
-2.68%
ALKEF - ABMBF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AGXKF - ABMBF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AISSF - ABMBF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

AGXKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AGXKF and AGPPF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AGXKF and AGPPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AGXKF
1D Price
Change %
AGXKF100%
N/A
AGPPF - AGXKF
11%
Poorly correlated
-5.86%
ALKEF - AGXKF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AHNR - AGXKF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AIRRF - AGXKF
0%
Poorly correlated
-5.69%
AISSF - AGXKF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More