ABMBF
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Updated
Dec 16 closing price
AISSF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 16 closing price
Ad is loading...

ABMBF vs AISSF

Header iconABMBF vs AISSF Comparison
Open Charts ABMBF vs AISSFBanner chart's image
Abcourt Mines
Price$0.04
Change+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Volume$70K
CapitalizationN/A
AIS Res
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
ABMBF vs AISSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ABMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
AISSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ABMBF vs. AISSF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABMBF is a StrongBuy and AISSF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (ABMBF: $0.04 vs. AISSF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: ABMBF and AISSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ABMBF: 215% vs. AISSF: 31%
Market capitalization -- ABMBF: $12.92M vs. AISSF: $1.54M
ABMBF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $12.92M. AISSF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.54M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ABMBF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileAISSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ABMBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • AISSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ABMBF is a better buy in the long-term than AISSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ABMBF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while AISSF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ABMBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • AISSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ABMBF is a better buy in the short-term than AISSF.

Price Growth

ABMBF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +23.08% price change this week, while AISSF (@Precious Metals) price change was -17.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -4.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.96%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-4.39% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ABMBF($12.9M) has a higher market cap than AISSF($1.54M). ABMBF YTD gains are higher at: 20.409 vs. AISSF (-67.836). AISSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -250.63K vs. ABMBF (-22.25M). ABMBF has more cash in the bank: 3.33M vs. AISSF (119K). AISSF has less debt than ABMBF: AISSF (488K) vs ABMBF (2.01M). ABMBF has higher revenues than AISSF: ABMBF (13.9M) vs AISSF (0).
ABMBFAISSFABMBF / AISSF
Capitalization12.9M1.54M837%
EBITDA-22.25M-250.63K8,878%
Gain YTD20.409-67.836-30%
P/E Ratio27.32N/A-
Revenue13.9M0-
Total Cash3.33M119K2,797%
Total Debt2.01M488K412%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ABMBF vs AISSF: Fundamental Ratings
ABMBF
AISSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2870
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10098
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4193
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
28100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
44n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AISSF's Valuation (66) in the null industry is in the same range as ABMBF (95). This means that AISSF’s stock grew similarly to ABMBF’s over the last 12 months.

AISSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ABMBF (100). This means that AISSF’s stock grew similarly to ABMBF’s over the last 12 months.

AISSF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as ABMBF (100). This means that AISSF’s stock grew similarly to ABMBF’s over the last 12 months.

ABMBF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AISSF (93). This means that ABMBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AISSF’s over the last 12 months.

ABMBF's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AISSF (100). This means that ABMBF’s stock grew significantly faster than AISSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ABMBFAISSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ABMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
AISSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MLUNX11.40N/A
N/A
MassMutual Mid Cap Value R3
IJEMX12.80-0.29
-2.22%
VY® JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity I
DGFYX27.40-0.66
-2.35%
Davis Global Y
JDVFX25.40-0.68
-2.61%
JHancock Disciplined Value R4
USGLX74.22-2.02
-2.65%
JHancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth A

ABMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ABMBF and HWAUF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ABMBF and HWAUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ABMBF
1D Price
Change %
ABMBF100%
N/A
HWAUF - ABMBF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.01%
ACKRF - ABMBF
16%
Poorly correlated
-3.11%
ALKEF - ABMBF
11%
Poorly correlated
-6.18%
AGXKF - ABMBF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AISSF - ABMBF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

AISSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AISSF and VLMZF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AISSF and VLMZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AISSF
1D Price
Change %
AISSF100%
N/A
VLMZF - AISSF
26%
Poorly correlated
+316.67%
BMXI - AISSF
22%
Poorly correlated
-7.55%
STPGF - AISSF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.91%
AIRRF - AISSF
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.11%
ALKEF - AISSF
3%
Poorly correlated
-6.18%
More