ABMBF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Updated
Jan 10 closing price
Capitalization
12.92M
AISSF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.54M
Ad is loading...

ABMBF vs AISSF

Header iconABMBF vs AISSF Comparison
Open Charts ABMBF vs AISSFBanner chart's image
Abcourt Mines
Price$0.03
Change-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization12.92M
AIS Res
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$300
Capitalization1.54M
ABMBF vs AISSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ABMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
AISSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ABMBF vs. AISSF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABMBF is a Hold and AISSF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (ABMBF: $0.03 vs. AISSF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: ABMBF and AISSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ABMBF: 0% vs. AISSF: 3%
Market capitalization -- ABMBF: $12.92M vs. AISSF: $1.54M
ABMBF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $12.92M. AISSF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.54M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ABMBF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileAISSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ABMBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • AISSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ABMBF is a better buy in the long-term than AISSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ABMBF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while AISSF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ABMBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • AISSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AISSF is a better buy in the short-term than ABMBF.

Price Growth

ABMBF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while AISSF (@Precious Metals) price change was +20.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.47%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.38% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ABMBF($12.9M) has a higher market cap than AISSF($1.54M). AISSF YTD gains are higher at: 20.750 vs. ABMBF (-0.175). AISSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -250.63K vs. ABMBF (-22.25M). ABMBF has more cash in the bank: 3.33M vs. AISSF (119K). AISSF has less debt than ABMBF: AISSF (488K) vs ABMBF (2.01M). ABMBF has higher revenues than AISSF: ABMBF (13.9M) vs AISSF (0).
ABMBFAISSFABMBF / AISSF
Capitalization12.9M1.54M837%
EBITDA-22.25M-250.63K8,878%
Gain YTD-0.17520.750-1%
P/E Ratio27.32N/A-
Revenue13.9M0-
Total Cash3.33M119K2,797%
Total Debt2.01M488K412%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ABMBF vs AISSF: Fundamental Ratings
ABMBF
AISSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10099
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6261
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
30100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AISSF's Valuation (67) in the null industry is in the same range as ABMBF (94). This means that AISSF’s stock grew similarly to ABMBF’s over the last 12 months.

AISSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ABMBF (100). This means that AISSF’s stock grew similarly to ABMBF’s over the last 12 months.

AISSF's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as ABMBF (100). This means that AISSF’s stock grew similarly to ABMBF’s over the last 12 months.

AISSF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as ABMBF (62). This means that AISSF’s stock grew similarly to ABMBF’s over the last 12 months.

ABMBF's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AISSF (100). This means that ABMBF’s stock grew significantly faster than AISSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ABMBFAISSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ABMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
AISSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CNRVX24.700.22
+0.90%
City National Rochdale US Cor Eq Svc
BEXUX15.080.12
+0.80%
Baron Emerging Markets R6
RSSRX27.240.14
+0.52%
Victory RS Select Growth R6
CIMEX24.710.11
+0.45%
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529E
RRRCX22.06-0.04
-0.18%
DWS RREEF Real Estate Securities C

ABMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ABMBF and HWAUF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ABMBF and HWAUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ABMBF
1D Price
Change %
ABMBF100%
N/A
HWAUF - ABMBF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.04%
ACKRF - ABMBF
16%
Poorly correlated
+2.47%
ALKEF - ABMBF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AGXKF - ABMBF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AISSF - ABMBF
6%
Poorly correlated
+20.75%
More

AISSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AISSF and VLMZF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AISSF and VLMZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AISSF
1D Price
Change %
AISSF100%
+20.75%
VLMZF - AISSF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BMXI - AISSF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.61%
STPGF - AISSF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AIRRF - AISSF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.46%
ALKEF - AISSF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More