ABMBF
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Updated
Dec 16 closing price
ALKEF
Price
$0.32
Change
-$0.02 (-5.88%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

ABMBF vs ALKEF

Header iconABMBF vs ALKEF Comparison
Open Charts ABMBF vs ALKEFBanner chart's image
Abcourt Mines
Price$0.04
Change+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Volume$70K
CapitalizationN/A
Alkane Resources
Price$0.32
Change-$0.02 (-5.88%)
Volume$3K
CapitalizationN/A
ABMBF vs ALKEF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ABMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ALKEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ABMBF vs. ALKEF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABMBF is a StrongBuy and ALKEF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (ABMBF: $0.04 vs. ALKEF: $0.32)
Brand notoriety: ABMBF and ALKEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ABMBF: 215% vs. ALKEF: 17%
Market capitalization -- ABMBF: $12.92M vs. ALKEF: $284.47M
ABMBF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $12.92M. ALKEF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $284.47M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ABMBF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileALKEF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ABMBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ALKEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ABMBF is a better buy in the long-term than ALKEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ABMBF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ALKEF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ABMBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • ALKEF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ABMBF is a better buy in the short-term than ALKEF.

Price Growth

ABMBF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +23.08% price change this week, while ALKEF (@Precious Metals) price change was -6.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -4.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.96%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-4.39% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALKEF($284M) has a higher market cap than ABMBF($12.9M). ABMBF has higher P/E ratio than ALKEF: ABMBF (27.32) vs ALKEF (12.89). ABMBF YTD gains are higher at: 20.409 vs. ALKEF (-26.306). ALKEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 91.3M vs. ABMBF (-22.25M). ALKEF has more cash in the bank: 48.3M vs. ABMBF (3.33M). ABMBF has less debt than ALKEF: ABMBF (2.01M) vs ALKEF (6.61M). ALKEF has higher revenues than ABMBF: ALKEF (182M) vs ABMBF (13.9M).
ABMBFALKEFABMBF / ALKEF
Capitalization12.9M284M5%
EBITDA-22.25M91.3M-24%
Gain YTD20.409-26.306-78%
P/E Ratio27.3212.89212%
Revenue13.9M182M8%
Total Cash3.33M48.3M7%
Total Debt2.01M6.61M30%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ABMBF vs ALKEF: Fundamental Ratings
ABMBF
ALKEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2835
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10058
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4153
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2824
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4449

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ALKEF's Valuation (66) in the null industry is in the same range as ABMBF (95). This means that ALKEF’s stock grew similarly to ABMBF’s over the last 12 months.

ALKEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ABMBF (100). This means that ALKEF’s stock grew similarly to ABMBF’s over the last 12 months.

ALKEF's SMR Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ABMBF (100). This means that ALKEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ABMBF’s over the last 12 months.

ABMBF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as ALKEF (53). This means that ABMBF’s stock grew similarly to ALKEF’s over the last 12 months.

ALKEF's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is in the same range as ABMBF (28). This means that ALKEF’s stock grew similarly to ABMBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ABMBFALKEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ABMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ALKEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RVPH1.430.03
+2.50%
Reviva Pharmaceuticals Holdings
ADSK292.83-9.99
-3.30%
Autodesk
VAL41.21-1.88
-4.36%
Valaris Limited
UNIT5.51-0.35
-5.97%
Uniti Group
MODV11.78-2.32
-16.42%
ModivCare

ABMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ABMBF and HWAUF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ABMBF and HWAUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ABMBF
1D Price
Change %
ABMBF100%
N/A
HWAUF - ABMBF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.01%
ACKRF - ABMBF
16%
Poorly correlated
-3.11%
ALKEF - ABMBF
11%
Poorly correlated
-6.18%
AGXKF - ABMBF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AISSF - ABMBF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

ALKEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ALKEF and BELGF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ALKEF and BELGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALKEF
1D Price
Change %
ALKEF100%
-6.18%
BELGF - ALKEF
26%
Poorly correlated
-7.26%
AAUGF - ALKEF
26%
Poorly correlated
-8.57%
RVTI - ALKEF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCDMF - ALKEF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MDSMF - ALKEF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More