ABMBF
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Updated
Dec 16 closing price
HWAUF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

ABMBF vs HWAUF

Header iconABMBF vs HWAUF Comparison
Open Charts ABMBF vs HWAUFBanner chart's image
Abcourt Mines
Price$0.04
Change+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Volume$70K
CapitalizationN/A
Headwater Gold
Price$0.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$40.5K
CapitalizationN/A
ABMBF vs HWAUF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ABMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ABMBF vs. HWAUF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABMBF is a StrongBuy and HWAUF is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (ABMBF: $0.04 vs. HWAUF: $0.14)
Brand notoriety: ABMBF and HWAUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ABMBF: 215% vs. HWAUF: 145%
Market capitalization -- ABMBF: $12.92M vs. HWAUF: $15.96M
ABMBF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $12.92M. HWAUF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $15.96M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ABMBF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHWAUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ABMBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HWAUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ABMBF is a better buy in the long-term than HWAUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ABMBF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HWAUF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ABMBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HWAUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ABMBF is a better buy in the short-term than HWAUF.

Price Growth

ABMBF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +23.08% price change this week, while HWAUF (@Precious Metals) price change was -5.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -4.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.96%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-4.39% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HWAUF($16M) has a higher market cap than ABMBF($12.9M). ABMBF YTD gains are higher at: 20.409 vs. HWAUF (-21.148). HWAUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -910.53K vs. ABMBF (-22.25M). HWAUF has more cash in the bank: 3.96M vs. ABMBF (3.33M). HWAUF has less debt than ABMBF: HWAUF (323K) vs ABMBF (2.01M). ABMBF has higher revenues than HWAUF: ABMBF (13.9M) vs HWAUF (0).
ABMBFHWAUFABMBF / HWAUF
Capitalization12.9M16M81%
EBITDA-22.25M-910.53K2,444%
Gain YTD20.409-21.148-97%
P/E Ratio27.32N/A-
Revenue13.9M0-
Total Cash3.33M3.96M84%
Total Debt2.01M323K623%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ABMBF: Fundamental Ratings
ABMBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
28
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
28
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
44

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ABMBFHWAUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ABMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
FOREX / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AUDGBP0.50N/A
N/A
Australian Dollar - United Kingdom Pound
CHFNZD1.95N/A
N/A
Switzerland Franc - New Zealand Dollar
GBPHKD9.88N/A
N/A
United Kingdom Pound - Hong Kong Dollar
QUS154.59-3.88
-2.45%
SPDR® MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
IPAY58.46-2.56
-4.20%
Amplify Digital Payments ETF

ABMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ABMBF and HWAUF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ABMBF and HWAUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ABMBF
1D Price
Change %
ABMBF100%
N/A
HWAUF - ABMBF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.01%
ACKRF - ABMBF
16%
Poorly correlated
-3.11%
ALKEF - ABMBF
11%
Poorly correlated
-6.18%
AGXKF - ABMBF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AISSF - ABMBF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HWAUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HWAUF and SSVFF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HWAUF and SSVFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWAUF
1D Price
Change %
HWAUF100%
-4.01%
SSVFF - HWAUF
26%
Poorly correlated
-10.27%
NFGC - HWAUF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.53%
APGOF - HWAUF
23%
Poorly correlated
-15.25%
GFI - HWAUF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.80%
DDEJF - HWAUF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More