ABMBF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
HWAUF
Price
$0.18
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
Ad is loading...

ABMBF vs HWAUF

Header iconABMBF vs HWAUF Comparison
Open Charts ABMBF vs HWAUFBanner chart's image
Abcourt Mines
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10.8K
CapitalizationN/A
Headwater Gold
Price$0.18
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
ABMBF vs HWAUF Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
ABMBF vs. HWAUF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABMBF is a Hold and HWAUF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (ABMBF: $0.05 vs. HWAUF: $0.17)
Brand notoriety: ABMBF and HWAUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ABMBF: 33% vs. HWAUF: 100%
Market capitalization -- ABMBF: $12.92M vs. HWAUF: $15.96M
ABMBF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $12.92M. HWAUF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $15.96M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ABMBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHWAUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ABMBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HWAUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ABMBF is a better buy in the long-term than HWAUF.

Price Growth

ABMBF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -5.10% price change this week, while HWAUF (@Precious Metals) price change was -3.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.61%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.12% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HWAUF($16M) has a higher market cap than ABMBF($12.9M). ABMBF YTD gains are higher at: 37.116 vs. HWAUF (-4.662). HWAUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -910.53K vs. ABMBF (-22.25M). HWAUF has more cash in the bank: 3.96M vs. ABMBF (3.33M). HWAUF has less debt than ABMBF: HWAUF (323K) vs ABMBF (2.01M). ABMBF has higher revenues than HWAUF: ABMBF (13.9M) vs HWAUF (0).
ABMBFHWAUFABMBF / HWAUF
Capitalization12.9M16M81%
EBITDA-22.25M-910.53K2,444%
Gain YTD37.116-4.662-796%
P/E Ratio27.32N/A-
Revenue13.9M0-
Total Cash3.33M3.96M84%
Total Debt2.01M323K623%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ABMBF: Fundamental Ratings
ABMBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
24
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

ABMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ABMBF and HWAUF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ABMBF and HWAUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ABMBF
1D Price
Change %
ABMBF100%
N/A
HWAUF - ABMBF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.52%
ACKRF - ABMBF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
AIRRF - ABMBF
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.74%
AHNR - ABMBF
2%
Poorly correlated
+22.50%
AISSF - ABMBF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HWAUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HWAUF and SSVFF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HWAUF and SSVFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWAUF
1D Price
Change %
HWAUF100%
+3.52%
SSVFF - HWAUF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.55%
NFGC - HWAUF
23%
Poorly correlated
+4.40%
DDEJF - HWAUF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.44%
GFI - HWAUF
22%
Poorly correlated
+5.44%
BKRRF - HWAUF
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.66%
More