ABMRF
Price
$26.80
Change
-$0.50 (-1.83%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
14.75B
ACGBF
Price
$0.74
Change
+$0.10 (+15.62%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
173.61B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ABMRF vs ACGBF

Header iconABMRF vs ACGBF Comparison
Open Charts ABMRF vs ACGBFBanner chart's image
ABN Amro Group
Price$26.80
Change-$0.50 (-1.83%)
Volume$1.05K
Capitalization14.75B
Agricultural Bank of China
Price$0.74
Change+$0.10 (+15.62%)
Volume$430.2K
Capitalization173.61B
ABMRF vs ACGBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ABMRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ACGBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ABMRF vs. ACGBF commentary
Jul 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABMRF is a StrongBuy and ACGBF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 03, 2025
Stock price -- (ABMRF: $26.80 vs. ACGBF: $0.74)
Brand notoriety: ABMRF and ACGBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ABMRF: 36% vs. ACGBF: 14%
Market capitalization -- ABMRF: $14.75B vs. ACGBF: $173.61B
ABMRF [@Major Banks] is valued at $14.75B. ACGBF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $173.61B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ABMRF’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileACGBF’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • ABMRF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • ACGBF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ABMRF and ACGBF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ABMRF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ACGBF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ABMRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ACGBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ACGBF is a better buy in the short-term than ABMRF.

Price Growth

ABMRF (@Major Banks) experienced а -0.74% price change this week, while ACGBF (@Major Banks) price change was +16.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

ACGBF is expected to report earnings on Apr 02, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.80% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACGBF($174B) has a higher market cap than ABMRF($14.8B). ABMRF has higher P/E ratio than ACGBF: ABMRF (6.01) vs ACGBF (3.52). ABMRF YTD gains are higher at: 67.501 vs. ACGBF (32.589). ABMRF has less debt than ACGBF: ABMRF (65.2B) vs ACGBF (2.25T). ACGBF has higher revenues than ABMRF: ACGBF (729B) vs ABMRF (7.99B).
ABMRFACGBFABMRF / ACGBF
Capitalization14.8B174B9%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD67.50132.589207%
P/E Ratio6.013.52171%
Revenue7.99B729B1%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt65.2B2.25T3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ABMRF vs ACGBF: Fundamental Ratings
ABMRF
ACGBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2646
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1515
SMR RATING
1..100
61
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3939
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1116
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ABMRF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is in the same range as ACGBF (19). This means that ABMRF’s stock grew similarly to ACGBF’s over the last 12 months.

ABMRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as ACGBF (15). This means that ABMRF’s stock grew similarly to ACGBF’s over the last 12 months.

ACGBF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as ABMRF (6). This means that ACGBF’s stock grew similarly to ABMRF’s over the last 12 months.

ACGBF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as ABMRF (39). This means that ACGBF’s stock grew similarly to ABMRF’s over the last 12 months.

ABMRF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as ACGBF (16). This means that ABMRF’s stock grew similarly to ACGBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ABMRFACGBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
20%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
23%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ABMRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ACGBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RZV109.882.03
+1.88%
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF
DYNF54.560.21
+0.39%
iShares U.S. Equity Fac Rotation Act ETF
CHI10.560.04
+0.38%
Calamos Convertible Opportunities and Income Fund
MDEV20.48N/A
N/A
First Trust Indxx Global Mdcl Dvcs ETF
XHYI38.13N/A
N/A
BondBloxx US High Yield Indstrl Sctr ETF

ABMRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ABMRF and JPM have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ABMRF and JPM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ABMRF
1D Price
Change %
ABMRF100%
N/A
JPM - ABMRF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
ACGBF - ABMRF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BACHY - ABMRF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
ACGBY - ABMRF
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.36%
BACHF - ABMRF
2%
Poorly correlated
-2.11%
More

ACGBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACGBF and ABMRF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACGBF and ABMRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACGBF
1D Price
Change %
ACGBF100%
N/A
ABMRF - ACGBF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BACHY - ACGBF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
ACGBY - ACGBF
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.36%
AGRPF - ACGBF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BCSO - ACGBF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More