ABMRF
Price
$29.48
Change
+$0.28 (+0.96%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
14.75B
ACGBY
Price
$16.68
Change
-$0.20 (-1.18%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
173.61B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ABMRF vs ACGBY

Header iconABMRF vs ACGBY Comparison
Open Charts ABMRF vs ACGBYBanner chart's image
ABN Amro Group
Price$29.48
Change+$0.28 (+0.96%)
Volume$622
Capitalization14.75B
Agricultural Bank of China
Price$16.68
Change-$0.20 (-1.18%)
Volume$5.15K
Capitalization173.61B
ABMRF vs ACGBY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ABMRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ACGBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ABMRF vs. ACGBY commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABMRF is a StrongBuy and ACGBY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (ABMRF: $29.48 vs. ACGBY: $16.68)
Brand notoriety: ABMRF and ACGBY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ABMRF: 22% vs. ACGBY: 20%
Market capitalization -- ABMRF: $14.75B vs. ACGBY: $173.61B
ABMRF [@Major Banks] is valued at $14.75B. ACGBY’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $173.61B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ABMRF’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileACGBY’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • ABMRF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • ACGBY’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ABMRF and ACGBY are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ABMRF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ACGBY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ABMRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • ACGBY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ACGBY is a better buy in the short-term than ABMRF.

Price Growth

ABMRF (@Major Banks) experienced а +0.94% price change this week, while ACGBY (@Major Banks) price change was -2.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

ACGBY is expected to report earnings on Apr 02, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.59% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACGBY($174B) has a higher market cap than ABMRF($14.8B). ABMRF has higher P/E ratio than ACGBY: ABMRF (6.01) vs ACGBY (3.61). ABMRF YTD gains are higher at: 84.220 vs. ACGBY (26.622). ACGBY has higher revenues than ABMRF: ACGBY (729B) vs ABMRF (7.99B).
ABMRFACGBYABMRF / ACGBY
Capitalization14.8B174B9%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD84.22026.622316%
P/E Ratio6.013.61166%
Revenue7.99B729B1%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt65.2BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ABMRF vs ACGBY: Fundamental Ratings
ABMRF
ACGBY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9168
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
126
SMR RATING
1..100
61
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3845
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1019
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
46n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ACGBY's Valuation (15) in the null industry is in the same range as ABMRF (21). This means that ACGBY’s stock grew similarly to ABMRF’s over the last 12 months.

ACGBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as ABMRF (12). This means that ACGBY’s stock grew similarly to ABMRF’s over the last 12 months.

ACGBY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as ABMRF (6). This means that ACGBY’s stock grew similarly to ABMRF’s over the last 12 months.

ABMRF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as ACGBY (45). This means that ABMRF’s stock grew similarly to ACGBY’s over the last 12 months.

ABMRF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as ACGBY (19). This means that ABMRF’s stock grew similarly to ACGBY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ABMRFACGBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ABMRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ACGBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BOE11.480.09
+0.79%
BlackRock Enhanced Global Dividend Trust
FDTX39.930.18
+0.44%
Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF
ELCV26.180.09
+0.34%
Eventide High Dividend ETF
DRV23.090.03
+0.13%
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3X ETF
SOXL25.60-0.02
-0.08%
Direxion Daily Semicondct Bull 3X ETF

ABMRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ABMRF and JPM have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ABMRF and JPM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ABMRF
1D Price
Change %
ABMRF100%
+0.94%
JPM - ABMRF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
ACGBF - ABMRF
6%
Poorly correlated
+7.17%
BACHY - ABMRF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.00%
ACGBY - ABMRF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.18%
BACHF - ABMRF
2%
Poorly correlated
-6.14%
More

ACGBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACGBY has been closely correlated with IDCBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ACGBY jumps, then IDCBY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACGBY
1D Price
Change %
ACGBY100%
-1.18%
IDCBY - ACGBY
77%
Closely correlated
-0.39%
CICHY - ACGBY
74%
Closely correlated
-1.08%
BACHY - ACGBY
69%
Closely correlated
-1.00%
CICHF - ACGBY
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.06%
AAVMY - ACGBY
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
More