ABNAF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Capitalization
1.32M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
DGDCF
Price
$0.14
Change
+$0.03 (+27.27%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Capitalization
8.75M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ABNAF vs DGDCF

Header iconABNAF vs DGDCF Comparison
Open Charts ABNAF vs DGDCFBanner chart's image
Aben Gold
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$450
Capitalization1.32M
Dynasty Gold
Price$0.14
Change+$0.03 (+27.27%)
Volume$16K
Capitalization8.75M
ABNAF vs DGDCF Comparison Chart in %
ABNAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
DGDCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ABNAF vs. DGDCF commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABNAF is a Hold and DGDCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (ABNAF: $0.05 vs. DGDCF: $0.14)
Brand notoriety: ABNAF and DGDCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ABNAF: 3% vs. DGDCF: 57%
Market capitalization -- ABNAF: $1.32M vs. DGDCF: $8.75M
ABNAF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.32M. DGDCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $8.75M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $106B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ABNAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDGDCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ABNAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DGDCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ABNAF and DGDCF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ABNAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DGDCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ABNAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • DGDCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ABNAF and DGDCF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ABNAF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -26.70% price change this week, while DGDCF (@Precious Metals) price change was -1.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +68.28%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-0.11% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DGDCF($8.75M) has a higher market cap than ABNAF($1.32M). DGDCF YTD gains are higher at: 46.080 vs. ABNAF (-5.155). ABNAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -477.92K vs. DGDCF (-638.08K). DGDCF has more cash in the bank: 2.23M vs. ABNAF (31K). ABNAF (0) and DGDCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
ABNAFDGDCFABNAF / DGDCF
Capitalization1.32M8.75M15%
EBITDA-477.92K-638.08K75%
Gain YTD-5.15546.080-11%
P/E Ratio10.91N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash31K2.23M1%
Total Debt312KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ABNAF vs DGDCF: Fundamental Ratings
ABNAF
DGDCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8665
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10081
SMR RATING
1..100
8990
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6261
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1350

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ABNAF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as DGDCF (37). This means that ABNAF’s stock grew similarly to DGDCF’s over the last 12 months.

DGDCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as ABNAF (100). This means that DGDCF’s stock grew similarly to ABNAF’s over the last 12 months.

ABNAF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as DGDCF (90). This means that ABNAF’s stock grew similarly to DGDCF’s over the last 12 months.

DGDCF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as ABNAF (62). This means that DGDCF’s stock grew similarly to ABNAF’s over the last 12 months.

DGDCF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ABNAF (100). This means that DGDCF’s stock grew similarly to ABNAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ABNAFDGDCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ABNAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
DGDCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MOV18.560.46
+2.54%
Movado Group
FIHL18.900.43
+2.33%
Fidelis Insurance Holdings Limited
WMS142.021.13
+0.80%
Advanced Drainage Systems
FDSB13.130.08
+0.61%
Fifth District Bancorp Inc
PRFX0.84-0.05
-5.30%
PainReform Ltd

ABNAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ABNAF and DGDCF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ABNAF and DGDCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ABNAF
1D Price
Change %
ABNAF100%
-14.81%
DGDCF - ABNAF
20%
Poorly correlated
+18.78%
AIRRF - ABNAF
4%
Poorly correlated
+4.17%
AGXKF - ABNAF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AISSF - ABNAF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AAMMF - ABNAF
-7%
Poorly correlated
+4.84%
More

DGDCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DGDCF and GSHRF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DGDCF and GSHRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DGDCF
1D Price
Change %
DGDCF100%
+18.78%
GSHRF - DGDCF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.81%
AEM - DGDCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
AGI - DGDCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.27%
ABNAF - DGDCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-14.81%
IAG - DGDCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.41%
More