Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABPCX vs RLBFX
ABPCX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts ABPCX vs RLBFX
AB Sustainable Thematic Bal Port C
Price$12.44
Change+$0.06 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets87.26M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$36.87
Change+$0.07 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets251.3B
ABPCX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABPCX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABPCX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 251B vs. ABPCX (87.3M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than ABPCX: RLBFX (2.10) vs ABPCX (0.08). ABPCX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: ABPCX (22 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). ABPCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). ABPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ABPCX: RLBFX (250) vs ABPCX (2500). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.97 vs. ABPCX (-0.40). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.37 vs. ABPCX (7.37).
| ABPCX | RLBFX | ABPCX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.29 | 603% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.29 | 690% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.230 | 8.017 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 87.3M | 251B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.08 | 2.10 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.40 | 5.97 | -7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.12 | 36.30 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.37 | 40.37 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.77 | 64.89 | 18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement