Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABPCX vs RLBFX
ABPCX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts ABPCX vs RLBFX
AB Sustainable Thematic Bal Port C
Price$12.27
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets87.12M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$36.21
Change-$0.04 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets248.02B
ABPCX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABPCX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jun 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABPCX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 248B vs. ABPCX (87.1M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than ABPCX: RLBFX (2.18) vs ABPCX (0.08). ABPCX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: ABPCX (22 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). ABPCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). ABPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ABPCX: RLBFX (250) vs ABPCX (2500). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.71 vs. ABPCX (1.32). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.43 vs. ABPCX (9.82).
| ABPCX | RLBFX | ABPCX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.29 | 603% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.29 | 690% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.239 | 6.084 | 20% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 87.1M | 248B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.08 | 2.18 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.32 | 6.71 | 20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.46 | 32.66 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.82 | 43.43 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.87 | 63.63 | 17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement