Ad is loading...
ABPYX vs RLBCX
ABPYX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts ABPYX vs RLBCX
AB Sustainable Thematic Bal Port Advisor
Price$11.42
Change+$0.15 (+1.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.77M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$33.05
Change+$0.34 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets224.6B
ABPYX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABPYX vs. RLBCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABPYX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 225B vs. ABPYX (80.8M). RLBCX pays higher dividends than ABPYX: RLBCX (1.69) vs ABPYX (1.58). ABPYX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: ABPYX (22 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). ABPYX (0.92) and RLBCX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. ABPYX (53.00). ABPYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: ABPYX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.33 vs. ABPYX (-3.19). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.89 vs. ABPYX (8.68).
| ABPYX | RLBCX | ABPYX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.89 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.89 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.770 | -3.879 | 226% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.8M | 225B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 1.69 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.19 | 1.33 | -240% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.71 | 11.21 | -6% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.68 | 30.89 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.56 | 40.86 | 16% |