Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABPYX vs RLBFX
ABPYX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts ABPYX vs RLBFX
AB Sustainable Thematic Bal Port Advisor
Price$12.97
Change+$0.11 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets84.74M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.25
Change+$0.48 (+1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.63B
ABPYX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABPYX vs. RLBFX commentary
Nov 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABPYX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. ABPYX (84.7M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than ABPYX: RLBFX (1.97) vs ABPYX (1.39). ABPYX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: ABPYX (22 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). ABPYX (0.92) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). ABPYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). ABPYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: ABPYX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.64 vs. ABPYX (2.39). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.29 vs. ABPYX (8.23).
| ABPYX | RLBFX | ABPYX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.29 | 259% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.29 | 317% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.410 | 15.389 | 35% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 84.7M | 266B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 1.97 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.39 | 9.64 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.26 | 41.50 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.23 | 40.29 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.20 | 75.79 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement