Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABPYX vs RLBFX
ABPYX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts ABPYX vs RLBFX
AB Sustainable Thematic Bal Port Advisor
Price$13.09
Change+$0.18 (+1.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets86.07M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.98
Change+$0.57 (+1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.29B
ABPYX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABPYX vs. RLBFX commentary
Oct 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABPYX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. ABPYX (86.1M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than ABPYX: RLBFX (2.00) vs ABPYX (1.41). ABPYX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: ABPYX (22 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). ABPYX (0.92) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). ABPYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). ABPYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: ABPYX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.89 vs. ABPYX (1.43). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.33 vs. ABPYX (11.95).
| ABPYX | RLBFX | ABPYX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.29 | 259% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.29 | 317% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.820 | 14.596 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 86.1M | 261B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 2.00 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.43 | 8.89 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.09 | 54.62 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.95 | 43.33 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.00 | 78.27 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement