Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABPYX vs RLBFX
ABPYX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts ABPYX vs RLBFX
AB Sustainable Thematic Bal Port Advisor
Price$12.88
Change+$0.03 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets86.77M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$37.82
Change+$0.13 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets255.46B
ABPYX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABPYX vs. RLBFX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABPYX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 255B vs. ABPYX (86.8M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than ABPYX: RLBFX (2.08) vs ABPYX (1.45). ABPYX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: ABPYX (22 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). ABPYX (0.92) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). ABPYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). ABPYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: ABPYX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.40 vs. ABPYX (2.07). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.12 vs. ABPYX (11.79).
| ABPYX | RLBFX | ABPYX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.29 | 259% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.29 | 317% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.328 | 10.801 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 86.8M | 255B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 2.08 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.07 | 8.40 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.55 | 36.67 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.79 | 39.12 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.85 | 77.18 | 36% |