Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABPYX vs RLBFX
ABPYX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts ABPYX vs RLBFX
AB Sustainable Thematic Bal Port Advisor
Price$12.66
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.29M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$37.02
Change+$0.10 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.22B
ABPYX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABPYX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABPYX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 252B vs. ABPYX (88.3M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than ABPYX: RLBFX (2.10) vs ABPYX (1.46). ABPYX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: ABPYX (22 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). ABPYX (0.92) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). ABPYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). ABPYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: ABPYX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.40 vs. ABPYX (3.73). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.34 vs. ABPYX (14.74).
| ABPYX | RLBFX | ABPYX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.29 | 259% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.29 | 317% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.689 | 8.457 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.3M | 252B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 2.10 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.73 | 7.40 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.05 | 36.90 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.74 | 42.34 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.76 | 66.96 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement