It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ABSOF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileASXFY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ABSOF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ASXFY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
ABSOF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ASXFY (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was -3.94% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -2.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.10%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -1.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.75%.
These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Financial Publishing/Services (-1.13% weekly)The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.
ABSOF | ASXFY | ABSOF / ASXFY | |
Capitalization | 6M | 8.04B | 0% |
EBITDA | -7.2K | 1.26B | -0% |
Gain YTD | -54.545 | 4.896 | -1,114% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 24.23 | - |
Revenue | 5.42M | 1.13B | 0% |
Total Cash | 11.7M | 13.9B | 0% |
Total Debt | N/A | 311M | - |
ABSOF | ASXFY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 94 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | 26 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 40 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 62 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ASXFY's Valuation (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ABSOF (63). This means that ASXFY’s stock grew somewhat faster than ABSOF’s over the last 12 months.
ASXFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ABSOF (100). This means that ASXFY’s stock grew similarly to ABSOF’s over the last 12 months.
ASXFY's SMR Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ABSOF (100). This means that ASXFY’s stock grew somewhat faster than ABSOF’s over the last 12 months.
ASXFY's Price Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ABSOF (96). This means that ASXFY’s stock grew somewhat faster than ABSOF’s over the last 12 months.
ASXFY's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ABSOF (100). This means that ASXFY’s stock grew somewhat faster than ABSOF’s over the last 12 months.
ABSOF | ASXFY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago64% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago60% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago43% | 2 days ago54% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago17% | 2 days ago60% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago18% | 2 days ago56% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago33% | 2 days ago54% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 15 days ago59% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago58% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago62% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago51% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
GSEW | 83.17 | 0.12 | +0.14% |
Goldman Sachs Equal Wght US Lg Cp Eq ETF | |||
RBIL | 50.01 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
F/m Ultrshrt Trs Infl-Protd Sec TIPS ETF | |||
BSMQ | 23.51 | N/A | N/A |
Invesco BulletShares 2026 Muncpl Bd ETF | |||
EFAD | 42.44 | -0.07 | -0.17% |
ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers | |||
OND | 44.44 | -0.62 | -1.37% |
ProShares On-Demand ETF |
A.I.dvisor tells us that ABSOF and SNEX have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ABSOF and SNEX's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ABSOF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ABSOF | 100% | N/A | ||
SNEX - ABSOF | 15% Poorly correlated | +2.67% | ||
MFH - ABSOF | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.44% | ||
CLSK - ABSOF | 4% Poorly correlated | -4.88% | ||
PIPR - ABSOF | 3% Poorly correlated | -0.63% | ||
ASXFY - ABSOF | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.54% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ASXFY has been loosely correlated with MQBKY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ASXFY jumps, then MQBKY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ASXFY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ASXFY | 100% | +0.54% | ||
MQBKY - ASXFY | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.78% | ||
CMSQY - ASXFY | 33% Poorly correlated | -1.89% | ||
EVR - ASXFY | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.92% | ||
SF - ASXFY | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.85% | ||
PIPR - ASXFY | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.63% | ||
More |