Ad is loading...
ABSOF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 28 closing price
CLSK
Price
$14.03
Change
+$0.05 (+0.36%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
31 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ABSOF vs CLSK

Header iconABSOF vs CLSK Comparison
Open Charts ABSOF vs CLSKBanner chart's image
ABS-CBN Holdings
Price$0.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5K
CapitalizationN/A
CleanSpark
Price$14.03
Change+$0.05 (+0.36%)
Volume$31.08M
CapitalizationN/A
ABSOF vs CLSK Comparison Chart
Loading...
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ABSOF vs. CLSK commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABSOF is a Hold and CLSK is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (ABSOF: $0.11 vs. CLSK: $14.03)
Brand notoriety: ABSOF and CLSK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ABSOF: 100% vs. CLSK: 107%
Market capitalization -- ABSOF: $17.91M vs. CLSK: $4.78B
ABSOF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $17.91M. CLSK’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $4.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ABSOF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCLSK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ABSOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ABSOF is a better buy in the long-term than CLSK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLSK’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CLSK’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

ABSOF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +3.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +2.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLSK is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+2.23% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSK($4.78B) has a higher market cap than ABSOF($17.9M). ABSOF YTD gains are higher at: 120.000 vs. CLSK (27.199). CLSK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 60.4M vs. ABSOF (-5.38K). CLSK has more cash in the bank: 176M vs. ABSOF (5.41M). CLSK has higher revenues than ABSOF: CLSK (216M) vs ABSOF (3.25M).
ABSOFCLSKABSOF / CLSK
Capitalization17.9M4.78B0%
EBITDA-5.38K60.4M-0%
Gain YTD120.00027.199441%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue3.25M216M2%
Total Cash5.41M176M3%
Total DebtN/A15.2M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ABSOF vs CLSK: Fundamental Ratings
ABSOF
CLSK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5026
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10073
SMR RATING
1..100
10091
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3836
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10087
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ABSOF's Valuation (47) in the null industry is in the same range as CLSK (71). This means that ABSOF’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as ABSOF (100). This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to ABSOF’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as ABSOF (100). This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to ABSOF’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as ABSOF (38). This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to ABSOF’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's P/E Growth Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as ABSOF (100). This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to ABSOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EDIV35.310.23
+0.66%
SPDR® S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
IBMR25.140.04
+0.16%
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bd ETF
EWU34.49-0.07
-0.20%
iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF
IWTR31.28-0.30
-0.94%
iShares MSCI Water Mgmt Mltsctr ETF
CANC26.19-1.10
-4.04%
Tema Oncology ETF

ABSOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ABSOF and SNEX have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ABSOF and SNEX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ABSOF
1D Price
Change %
ABSOF100%
N/A
SNEX - ABSOF
15%
Poorly correlated
+1.52%
MFH - ABSOF
10%
Poorly correlated
+5.88%
CLSK - ABSOF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
PIPR - ABSOF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.42%
ASXFY - ABSOF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.31%
More

CLSK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSK has been closely correlated with RIOT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSK jumps, then RIOT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLSK
1D Price
Change %
CLSK100%
+0.36%
RIOT - CLSK
86%
Closely correlated
+4.26%
MARA - CLSK
83%
Closely correlated
+1.35%
HIVE - CLSK
77%
Closely correlated
+2.90%
WULF - CLSK
74%
Closely correlated
+3.38%
MSTR - CLSK
74%
Closely correlated
+3.96%
More