Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABSZX vs WCMFX
ABSZX vs WCMFX Comparison
Open Charts ABSZX vs WCMFX
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Institutional
Price$3.36
Change-$0.01 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.92M
ABSZX vs WCMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABSZX vs. WCMFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABSZX is a Hold and WCMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ABSZX has more cash in the bank: 2.21B vs. WCMFX (5.92M). ABSZX pays higher dividends than WCMFX: ABSZX (0.79) vs WCMFX (0.00). ABSZX was incepted earlier than WCMFX: ABSZX (12 years) vs WCMFX (6 years). WCMFX (1.45) is less costly to investors than ABSZX (0.81). ABSZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. WCMFX (15.00). WCMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ABSZX: WCMFX (100000) vs ABSZX (2000000). ABSZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -16.21 vs. WCMFX (-76.28). ABSZX return over 5 years is better than : 10.60 vs. WCMFX (-65.29).
| ABSZX | WCMFX | ABSZX / WCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.90 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.45 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.961 | -71.870 | 3% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 100000 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.21B | 5.92M | 37,340% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.21 | -76.28 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.45 | -67.31 | 7% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.60 | -65.29 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.72 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement