Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABSZX vs WCMFX
ABSZX vs WCMFX Comparison
Open Charts ABSZX vs WCMFX
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Institutional
Price$11.32
Change+$0.05 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.71M
ABSZX vs WCMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABSZX vs. WCMFX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABSZX is a Hold and WCMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ABSZX has more cash in the bank: 2.27B vs. WCMFX (21.7M). ABSZX pays higher dividends than WCMFX: ABSZX (0.78) vs WCMFX (0.00). ABSZX was incepted earlier than WCMFX: ABSZX (12 years) vs WCMFX (6 years). WCMFX (1.45) is less costly to investors than ABSZX (0.81). ABSZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. WCMFX (15.00). WCMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ABSZX: WCMFX (100000) vs ABSZX (2000000). ABSZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.92 vs. WCMFX (-20.97). ABSZX return over 5 years is better than : 24.56 vs. WCMFX (22.90).
| ABSZX | WCMFX | ABSZX / WCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.90 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.45 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.245 | -5.927 | 4% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 100000 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.27B | 21.7M | 10,479% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.92 | -20.97 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.86 | 15.95 | 12% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.56 | 22.90 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.72 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement