It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ABT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ABT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
ABT (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -0.48% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +0.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.89%.
ABT is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
ABT | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 18 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 49 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ABT | PCGG | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago59% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago44% | 1 day ago68% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago65% | 1 day ago77% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago62% | 1 day ago44% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago50% | 1 day ago85% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago53% | 1 day ago84% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago57% | 1 day ago85% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago51% | 4 days ago69% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago47% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago47% | 1 day ago86% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ABT has been loosely correlated with MDT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ABT jumps, then MDT could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that PCGG and V have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PCGG and V's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PCGG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PCGG | 100% | +0.41% | ||
V - PCGG | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.14% | ||
ABT - PCGG | 14% Poorly correlated | -0.07% | ||
ACN - PCGG | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.37% | ||
ZTS - PCGG | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.37% | ||
MA - PCGG | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.03% | ||
More |