It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ABT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePHG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ABT’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PHG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
ABT (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +3.72% price change this week, while PHG (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -1.24% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +2.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.55%.
ABT is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.
PHG is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
ABT | PHG | ABT / PHG | |
Capitalization | 231B | 26.5B | 872% |
EBITDA | 11.6B | 2.41B | 481% |
Gain YTD | 20.332 | 19.082 | 107% |
P/E Ratio | 16.83 | 148.35 | 11% |
Revenue | 43.1B | 17.9B | 241% |
Total Cash | 7.28B | 1.82B | 399% |
Total Debt | 13.4B | 8.43B | 159% |
ABT | PHG | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 18 Undervalued | 58 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 48 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 31 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | 10 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 17 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ABT's Valuation (18) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PHG (58) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that ABT’s stock grew somewhat faster than PHG’s over the last 12 months.
ABT's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PHG (100) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that ABT’s stock grew somewhat faster than PHG’s over the last 12 months.
ABT's SMR Rating (31) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PHG (91) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that ABT’s stock grew somewhat faster than PHG’s over the last 12 months.
ABT's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as PHG (48) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that ABT’s stock grew similarly to PHG’s over the last 12 months.
PHG's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for ABT (96) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that PHG’s stock grew significantly faster than ABT’s over the last 12 months.
ABT | PHG | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago62% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago47% | 1 day ago58% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 1 day ago58% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago49% | 1 day ago62% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago56% | 1 day ago59% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago52% | 1 day ago56% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago56% | 8 days ago61% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago51% | 1 day ago59% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago63% | 1 day ago61% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago51% | 1 day ago57% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
HIO | 4.04 | 0.03 | +0.75% |
Western Asset High Income Opportunity Fund | |||
WINC | 24.22 | N/A | N/A |
Western Asset Short Duration Income ETF | |||
PMFB | 25.85 | N/A | N/A |
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - February | |||
FLJP | 35.01 | -0.07 | -0.20% |
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF | |||
RZG | 53.95 | -0.17 | -0.32% |
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Gr ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHG has been loosely correlated with RYLPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PHG jumps, then RYLPF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PHG | 100% | -0.50% | ||
RYLPF - PHG | 56% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
ALC - PHG | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.57% | ||
BAX - PHG | 40% Loosely correlated | -2.81% | ||
QGEN - PHG | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
SYK - PHG | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
More |